Answer:
If Doe sues, the best basis for the lawsuit would be: invasion of privacy by appropriation.
Explanation:
Doe can sue for invasion of privacy by appropriation of likeness because the Hee-Man Company used his (Doe's) photograph to advertise. Generally, invasion of privacy by appropriation refers to situations whereby someone’s identity has been used without their permission, probably to advertise, make money, or do anything that could bring gains.
Answer and Explanation:
1. The state of New York can claim that they are within the rights defended by the bathroom bill (since this law allows the restriction of transgender people to bathrooms that are not determined by their gender of birth) and that the decision was made to maintain the safety of cisgender people.
2. I would recommend that the family look for facts that prove that this measure does not promote the safety of anyone, as there have never been cases of attacks by transgender individuals on cisgender individuals in public bathrooms, on the contrary, this measure causes insecurity for transgender individuals. , since there are countless cases of attacks on these individuals due to prejudice, homophobia and intolerance. In addition, the family may claim that the bathroom bill also advocates allowing transgender individuals to access toilets that match their gender identity, as a measure of security and promoting equality.
Answer:
Elections
Explanation:
I would guess that elections are what make a representative form of government actually representative. Without elections, the ones in power would not actually represent the views of the people.
