Answer:
absolutely nothing because they both suck
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you forgot to attach the picture of the vehicles, we can say the following.
The two options you have in order to abide by the Move Over law is that as soon as you see the first response vehicle coming your way, you have to move. If you can't move over for whatever reason, or in the case you are driving on a two-lane road, you have to reduce your speed. The law indicates that your speed reduction must be 20 mph less than the official speed limit.
This way, first response vehicles such as ambulances, police cars, sanitation vehicles or wreckers, can pass through and get to the site as soon as possible to offer help.
Answer: Woodson v North Carolina and Roberts v Lousianna
Explanation:
In Boykin v. Alabama (1969), the Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the death penalty for the first time.
By 1972, Furman v. Georgia ruled a Georgia death penalty law was cruel and unusual punishment, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. In 1976 there were five "Death Penalty Cases". While Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, and Proffitt v. Florida, confirmed the states´ death penalties, Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana overturned the mandatory death sentences.
Answer:
unethical
1. because everyone should be treated the same as the other.
2. because it is wrong to persuade the prosecutor even if they are friends or not.
3.if the client has done something wrong then he should be treated nicer he should be treated normally as everyone else even if the lawyer is friends with the prosecutor
Explanation:
