Answer:
This is an example of a mitigating factor.
Explanation:
In criminal law, a mitigating factor is an extenuating circumstance or condition that might lead the jury or judge to lessen a sentence or take into consideration because it explains in greater detail why a defendant might have committed a crime. The factor or circumstance usually makes it more understandable why the defendant took certain actions or why it is possible to have some sympathy or empathy for the defendant. An example would be if the defendant had been manipulated by someone else, for example, or if the crime was committed under duress of some sort, like being mandated to do something by your superiors at work.
We can get off our phones , and start enjoying simple things on life but then we'll feel left out from society , This leads to depression though or it can lead to total freedom over yourself , being on our phones on am addiction little people know they have.
The correct answer is: Holden has high effortful control.
Effortful control refers to children's ability to inhibit their most dominant emotion, and instead respond in an alternative, subdominant way. In other words, children suppress what they feel most strongly, and substitute it with another, more acceptable response. In this instance, Holden has high effortful control because he is able to curb his negative feelings and behavior when his parents forbid him from doing certain things he wants to, and is able to hold back his irritation and upset.
Im not sure about this question but i would have to say that philosophy and politics would really be the best answer for this type of question.