Answer:
2. Reflect situational, or contingency, conditions
Explanation:
Organizational Behavior must reflect situational, or contingency, conditions to study human nature
Answer:
The statement is not an express warranty, because it doesn't involve a negotiation of terms between Salazar and Mitsubishi. It is an employee of the company that imploy Salazar to bring the car should the car gives problem, and didn't involve an agreement between the two parties ( Salazar and Mitsubishi)
Explanation:
What is express warranty?
An express warranty arises from the parties’ negotiations in a sales transaction. Express warranties are often included in the written terms of a contract. An “express” warranty by a seller is created by:
Any statement of fact or promise relating to the goods sold which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the statement or promise.
Any description of the goods sold which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the description.
Any sample or model, which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the sample or model.
An express warranty may be created even if the seller does not use formal words such as “warranty” or “guarantee,” and even if the seller does not have a specific intention to make a warranty. However, an express warranty is not created merely because the seller makes a statement as to the value of the goods, or as to seller’s opinion of the goods. Generally, statements made by a seller during the course of contract negotiations are treated as statements of fact, unless it can be shown that the buyer could only have reasonably considered the statement to be an opinion.
A common tool project teams use to show resource assignments is a responsibility matrix. Typically, this chart will depict what role each person on the team will have during each activity.
Managers set up a log to show each persons role for project completion. This allows for more streamline work and eliminates the questions regarding what each person should or shouldn't be doing.
Answer: Winona has the lowest opportunity cost of completing the task.
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the opportunity cost will be calculated as:
= Earnings per hour × Hours taken to complete the task
Therefore, for Winona, the opportunity cost will be:
= 1 × $200.
= $200.
For Hubert, the opportunity cost will be:
= 9 × $25
= $225
Therefore, based on the calculation above, Winona has the lowest opportunity cost of completing the task.
