The gift of smell is the first one. Its useful to his clan because he can tell if food is safe or not.
A trash man.
A sous chef oversees the chef job if he is absent
Remys coworker eats the soup
They thought it was delicious
The person might choose to put a review online
Population interactions between the first Spanish explorers and Indigenous Peoples demonstrate about encountering the unfamiliar.
altered Lifestyles The Spanish altered Indian life in many ways. Their intrusion resulted in changing tribal customs and religious traditions. Tribal alliances were shifted and new rivalries were developed. Indians lost their land, their families, and their lives.
The Native Americans resented and resisted the colonists' attempts to change them. Their refusal to conform to European culture angered the colonists and hostilities soon broke out between the two groups.
When we want more land, go on expeditions to conquer it. The strong Catholic missionary impulse of the time also meant a strong emphasis on converting the natives to Catholicism, which made it easier for Spaniards to intermarry with them.
Learn more about the population here:-
brainly.com/question/25630111
#SPJ4
Answer:
The politics of Canada function within a framework of parliamentary democracy and a federal system of parliamentary government with strong democratic traditions. Canada is a constitutional monarchy, in which the monarch is head of state. ... Canada has placed emphasis on equality and inclusiveness for all its people.
Explanation:
By trade, as people came over from other parts of the world, the muslims spread islam to the traders who came to arabia, they traded nice rugs and silks and such with other countries who were there.
<span>I believe the correct answer is: Concurring opinion.
The concurring opinion is the term used in law that refers to an opinion written by judge/judges of court which agrees with the majority, but outlines additional considerations (different reasons) he or she thinks are important.
Even though Concurring opinions can’t change the final decision, but can serve as a persuasive argument for lawyers, in many legal systems these opinions are not reported as the court "speaks with one voice".</span>
