Answer:
cross-sectional design
Explanation:
Cross-sectional design: In psychological research, the term "cross-sectional design" is determined as one of the types of "observational study design". While conducting a cross-sectional study design, researcher, investigator, or an experimenter tends to measure the exposures and different outcomes in given study participants or subjects at a specific point in time.
In other words, the cross-sectional study design measures different participants at one point in time.
In the question above, the given statement represents that cross-sectional design was used in the given study.
Answer:
Cultural diffusion. See my explanation
Explanation:
The greeks were heavily divided amongst city-states, such as Sparta, and Athens. After the Persian Empire invaded, the Greeks saw things in a new light. They grouped together and fought. They were defeated, but later reclaimed Greece. While occupied by the Persians, they learned new things about tools and weapons. The Persians did not however force their own idealogies and religious beliefs on the greeks.
Scientists should definitely use evidence - and they collect this evidence though especially designed experiments. Based on their data and assumptions they build models which they then test, but they can base their conclusions based on the models too.
What they should not do is based the conclusions on opinions, because opinions are not imparcial- they can state them as opinions, but not as conclusions.
<span />
Frankly, I think that the motives of the conquistador lies in their name. These men wanted to conquer "the other," that which was in front of them. They did not come in peaceful harmony. Their motives were to conquer and capture that which existed in their path to extolling their own glory, and that of nation in a secondary capacity. The Conquistador use of force through the military reveals that their motives were to control New lands and native populations.
