1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arturiano [62]
3 years ago
15

Our company can produce a product that incurs the following costs per unit: direct materials, $10; direct labor, $24, and overhe

ad, $16. An outside supplier has offered to sell the product to us for $45. If the company buys from the supplier, it will still incur 45% of its overhead cost. Compute the net incremental cost or savings of buying.
Business
1 answer:
kvasek [131]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

net incremental cost = $ 2.2

Explanation:

Data provided:

Direct material cost = $ 10  per unit

Direct labor cost = $ 24  per unit

Overhead cost = $ 16 per unit

thus,

the total cost of the product = $ 10 + $ 24 + $ 16 = $ 50

Now,

if bought from outside cost = $ 45

Overhead cost if bought from outside = 45% of the overhead cost

= 0.45 × $ 16 = $ 7.2

hence, the total cost if bought from outside = $ 45 + $ 7.2 = $ 52.2

since, the cost of product if bought from outside side is greater than the product is produced by own

therefore, the net incremental cost = $ 52.2 - $ 50 = $ 2.2

You might be interested in
Which statement accurately describes the effect of the federal government rapidly reducing government expenditures?
olganol [36]
The statement which accurately describes the effect of the federal government rapidly reducing government expenditures is D.Unemployment rates will increase because federal spending makes up a large part of the economy. Since the goverment keeps up money for particular economic expenses, it means that the salaries will be decreased and the level of firing people wold decrease. Therefore, companies will not be able to offer a escent salary to their new empoyees which means that unemployment rate will grow.
4 0
3 years ago
g Product #1 Product #2 Historical cost $26 $51 Replacement cost 16 28 Estimated cost to dispose 23 25 Estimated selling price 5
Darya [45]

Answer:Product 1 will be valued at $16,  Product 2 will be valued at $29

Explanation:

Lower of Cost or Market

Lower of Cost or Market is a Method for Valuing inventory which stipulates  that inventory must be valued at the lower of cost or market price. Market price is defined as the replacement cost of inventory. There is however a Criteria to be followed when using Replacement costs

The replacement cost should not exceed or should not be greater than the Net Realizable Value, Net Realizable Value is the net amount we would receive from the sale of inventory after settling cost of selling inventory. If Replacement Cost is greater than Net relizable value, Net Realizable Value will be compared to historical cost in determining the value of inventory

The Replacement Cost Should also not be less than Net relizable value minus Ordinary profit, if it is less , Net relizable value minus Ordinary profit will be compare to historical costs in determining the value of inventory.

Replacement costs will be used if they are lower than Net realizable value and Higher than Net relizable value minus Ordinary profit

Product 1

Historical cost = $26

Net Realizable Value = $52 - 23 = $29

Net realizable Value minus Ordinary Profit = $29 - ( 52 -26) = $3

Replacement Cost $16

Replacement costs ($16) are less than Net realizable value ($29) But they are higher than Net realizable value minus Ordinary Profit ($3),. Product 1 will be valued at the lower of cost $26 or $16

Product 1 will be valued at $16

Product 2

Historical cost = $51

Net Realizable Value = $80 - 25 = $55

Net realizable Value minus Ordinary Profit = $29 - ( $80 -51) = $29

Replacement Cost $28

Replacement costs ($28) are less than Net realizable value ($55). They are also lower than Net realizable value minus Ordinary Profit ($29). Product 2 will be valued at the lower of cost $51 or $29

Product 2 will be valued at $29

5 0
3 years ago
Assume that a country has a closed economy that has only three goods/services. That is, there is no trade with other countries,
postnew [5]

<u>Explanation:</u>

Given

Consumption = (10 x 30) = 300

Investment = (100 x 2) = 200

Government Spending = (500 x 1) =500

13. Total GDP for this economy = Consumption + Investment+ Government spending

=(10 x 30) + (100 x 2) + (500 x 1)

=$1000

14. Consumption % on GDP

= Consumption/ Total GDP x 100

=(300/1000) x 100

= 30%

15. Investment % in GDP

= Investment / Total GDP x 100

=(200/ 1000) x 100

=20%

16. Government spending % on GDP

=Government spending/ Total GDP x 100

=(500/1000) x 100

=50%

5 0
3 years ago
You plan to borrow $40,000 at a 6% annual interest rate. The terms require you to amortize the loan with 7 equal end-of-year pay
STALIN [3.7K]

Answer:

Interest for second year $2,114.08

Explanation:

given data

loan Amount = $40,000.00  

Interest rate r = 6.00%  

time period t = 7  

solution

we get here first Equal Monthly Payment EMI that is express as

EMI = \frac{P \times r \times (1+r)^t}{(1+r)^t-1}      ................1

here P is Loan Amount and r is rate and t is time period  

put here value and we get  

EMI = \frac{40000 \times 0.06 \times (1+0.06)^7}{(1+0.06)^7-1}    

EMI = $7165.40  

now

we get here interest for second year that is

Closing balance at year 1 = opening balance + Interest - EMI Payment

Closing balance at year 1 =  $40,000  + $2400 - $7165.40  

Closing balance at year 1 =   $35234.60

so Interest for second year $2,114.08

8 0
4 years ago
A bank will often hold government securities as an asset. If a bank were to sell S500,000 in government securities to an individ
sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:a.

It would increase by $500,000 multiplied by the reciprocal of the required reserve ratio.

Explanation:

A bank will often hold government securities as an asset. If a bank were to sell S500,000 in government securities to an individual who paid for the bond in cash and the bank placed this cash in its vault, by how much would the money supply change as a result  -  It would increase by $500,000 multiplied by the reciprocal of the required reserve ratio.

The money supply is the entire stock of currency and other liquid instruments circulating in a country's economy and is given by the formula:

MONEY SUPPLY = RESERVES X MONEY MULTIPLIER

Therefore the bank reserves increasing in the scenario will increase money supplier by the effect of the money multiplier or the reciprocal of the required reserve ratio.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Marcie goes to the salon and has a pedicure and a manicure. What has Marcie purchased from the salon?
    13·1 answer
  • If parents say, "Never take candy from strangers" then why do we celebrate Halloween?
    14·2 answers
  • Paper Co. had net income of $70,000 during the year. Dividend payment was $10,000. The followinginformation is available:Mortgag
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT true about business incubators?
    11·1 answer
  • The expected average rate of return for a proposed investment of $4,250,000 in a fixed asset, using straight-line depreciation,
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP::::
    15·1 answer
  • The following trial balance was extracted from the books of Kalekeno, a sole trader, at 31st Dec2018:
    14·1 answer
  • Vijay Inc. purchased a three-acre tract of land for a building site for $310,000. On the land was a building with an appraised v
    11·1 answer
  • What is an an intrinsic reward?
    14·1 answer
  • In 1971, under president richard nixon, the federal government passed legislation that "froze" wages and the prices of consumer
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!