Upper class individuals are more likely to work in safer environments, such as an office is not an explanation for the given statement.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the given statement the discussion involves life expectancy with respect to education, occupation and income and explain its meaning that upper class live longer and healthier lives than those in lower class.
But the statement that upper class individuals are more likely to work in safer environments, such as an office do not categorize statement according to lower or upper class, that safer environment for work can be available among educated, occupated and handsome income constituted society only, because many brutal cases are examples of unsafe working atmosphere too and even in well structured office.
Education, Occupation and Income are sources of happiness but decision to stay happy and sensible for either rich or poor basically generate from within’s intellectual learning and not biased with any race.
A tyrant would want to convince the people not to insist on democracy. He could use arguments such as:
Democracy will make the country weak and vulnerable to outside attacks
Democracy will not be an efficient form of government because people would argue too much
His rule is better because it provides stability
the answer is A
hope this helps stay safe and god bless you
Yes, initially if anything is written in a formal matter the tone and the context of the text or passage shall be written in a formal matter.
