In accordance with <em>propositional</em> logic, <em>quantifier</em> theory and definitions of <em>simple</em> and <em>composite</em> propositions, the negation of a implication has the following equivalence:
(Correct choice: iii)
<h3>How to find the equivalent form of a proposition</h3>
Herein we have a <em>composite</em> proposition, that is, the union of <em>monary</em> and <em>binary</em> operators and <em>simple</em> propositions. According to <em>propositional</em> logic and <em>quantifier</em> theory, the negation of an implication is equivalent to:
To learn more on propositions: brainly.com/question/14789062
#SPJ1
2(n+4) + 6 = (1/2)(3-n)
Then 2n + 8 + 6 = 3/2 - n/2
and 2n + 14 = 3/2 - n/2
(5/2)n = 3/2 - 28/2 = -25/2
-25/2
n = -------------- = -5 (answer)
5/2
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
i cannot find an answer from the expression but i can guess if you didnt follow pemdas, it would be d
3.5 × 102 is 357
(8 × 10−4) + (6 × 10−4) is 132
132/357= .369 or .37 or 0 simplified
d is 4*10-10
10-10 is 0
4*0 is 0
I'm going to divide number one to 6 parts
1.
=
2.
=
3.
=
4.
=
5.
=
6.
=
because to make the denominator to 100, you need to multiply 10 by 10 which is 100.
and because you multiply 10, you also have to multiply the numerator by 10.
EXAMPLES:
=
×
=
First we identify the percent's as decimals
1%=0.01 64%=0.64
Then we multiply our decimals by 300
0.01 x 300 = 3 0.64 x 300 = 192
If you notice, 64 x 3 is equal to 192
64 x 3 = 192
So the answers are 3 and 192
(Hope this helps!)
