Answer:
x < -3/2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
√
8
≈
3
Explanation:
Note that:
2
2
=
4
<
8
<
9
=
3
2
Hence the (positive) square root of
8
is somewhere between
2
and
3
. Since
8
is much closer to
9
=
3
2
than
4
=
2
2
, we can deduce that the closest integer to the square root is
3
.
We can use this proximity of the square root of
8
to
3
to derive an efficient method for finding approximations.
Consider a quadratic with zeros
3
+
√
8
and
3
−
√
8
:
(
x
−
3
−
√
8
)
(
x
−
3
+
√
8
)
=
(
x
−
3
)
2
−
8
=
x
2
−
6
x
+
1
From this quadratic, we can define a sequence of integers recursively as follows:
⎧
⎪
⎨
⎪
⎩
a
0
=
0
a
1
=
1
a
n
+
2
=
6
a
n
+
1
−
a
n
The first few terms are:
0
,
1
,
6
,
35
,
204
,
1189
,
6930
,
...
The ratio between successive terms will tend very quickly towards
3
+
√
8
.
So:
√
8
≈
6930
1189
−
3
=
3363
1189
≈
2.828427
To be honest I think it’s 48 round the three
Answer:
Whats the full question ?
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
<u>60+14.35=88.27</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
5x12 for the rectangle on the right, then for the circle, using the formula A=πr², I get 28.27, which you divide by 2 because you only need half of the circle, and you get 88.27. I calculated the radius by subtracting 12-6 and then dividing that in half because the radius is half of the distance to the other end of the circle. Then you get the radius of 3, then plug it into the formula to get π(3)², which is just 3.14(9), and you get 28.27.
