1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fantom [35]
3 years ago
12

What is a main difference between the U.S. Congress and the British Parliament?

History
2 answers:
Katarina [22]3 years ago
5 0

nswer:

In modern politics and history, a parliament is a legislative body of government. Generally, a modern parliament has three functions: representing the electorate, making laws, and overseeing the government via hearings and inquiries. The term is similar to the idea of a senate,or congress, and is commonly used in countries that are current or former monarchies, a form of government with a monarch as the head. Some contexts restrict the use of the word parliament to parliamentary systems, although it is also used to describe the legislature in some presidential systems (e.g. the Parliament of Burundi), even where it is not in the official name.

Historically, parliaments included various kinds of deliberative, consultative, and judicial assemblies, e.g. medieval parliamentsThe English term is derived from Anglo-Norman and dates to the 14th century, coming from t11th century Old French parlement, from parler, meaning "to talk".[2] The meaning evolved over time, originally referring to any discussion, conversation, or negotiation through various kinds of deliberative or judicial groups, often summoned by a monarch. By the 15th century, in Britain, it had come to specifically mean the legislature.[3]

Early parliaments

See also: History of Parliamentarism

Since ancient times, when societies were tribal, there were councils or a headman whose decisions were assessed by village elders. This is called tribalism.[4] Some scholars suggest that in ancient Mesopotamia ther primitive democratic government where the kings were assessed by council.[5] The same has been said about ancient India, where some form of deliberative assemblies existed, and therefore there was some form of democracy.[6] However, these claims are not accepted by most scholarso see these forms of government as oligarchies.[7][8][9][10][11] ncient Athens was the cradle of democracy.[12] The Athenian assemblost imporcould representative, but rathedirect, and therefore the ekklesia was different from the parliamentary system.

Bad White [126]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

that other guy is r3tar13d

Explanation:

You might be interested in
PLS HELP
Hoochie [10]

Your left foot should be on the clutch pedal while your right foot should be on the gas pedal

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the colonists feel they had the right to rebel against the British government?
Vinvika [58]

In the early days of British colonization, the British gave the colonists a lot of self governing powers and autonomy, and it remained this way for several years. However, when King George III took power he tightened the grip on their colonies a lot more, which created some tensions. One big thing was after the French and Indian War, the British heavily taxed the colonists with things like the Stamp Act because it has cost the British government a lot of money to defend the colonies in the. This angered a lot of colonists because they were getting taxed without consent in that they have no representation in Parliament. Although other British colonies also did not have representation, the colonists felt that they were just as valid as British citizens as those in GB, so they were angry that they had to pay all these taxes without agreeing to them. Hence the phrase "no taxation without representation"

3 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer.
n200080 [17]

Answer:

b. department of homeland security.

Explanation:

Homeland Security is the main department of the U.S. government whose objective is to deter terrorist attacks. Homeland Security is a Cabinet-level agency whose roots lie in the nation's reaction to the attacks of 11 September 2001, when members of the al-Qaeda terrorist organization boarded and deliberately crashed commercial airliners of the United States into the World Trade Center Towers.

3 0
3 years ago
What steps might people have taken to prevent genocide? Provide examples of those steps.
kherson [118]

Answer:

Explanation:

Which genocide? There were many. That's the worst part of human history-- war and genocides.

The first major problem is hatred. Someone hates someone else. The side doing that hating always has the power to create a genocide. There isn't much that you can do about that: people hate and they have the power to indulge their hatred. There is nothing that can persuade people not to hate. The way to fight it is, sadly, to let the genocide happen.

Usually when people think of genocides, they think of the European one between 1942 and 1945 in Nazi Germany.  The war had been going on for just about 3 years before the Wannsee Conference took place in January of 1942. By then Germany was beginning to weaken and people accepted easily that the Jews were somehow at the bottom of loosing the war. The Jews were certainly credited with being at the bottom of the loss of WWI.  Still, there was nothing that could be done. Hitler's Propaganda was more easily accepted once Germany's casualties began to mount.

Prior to the Wannsee Conference, Madagascar was suggested as a possible relocation place for the Jews. The high ranking German officials rejected this, especially when Madagascar began to  fall to the allies in beginning in May of 1942.

The death camps had their birth in this background.

The doors closed to the Jewish people in Great Britain, in the United States and in every other location they could have gone to.

I hate to be a pessimist, but once the ground work was laid, nothing could prevent a the German Holocaust. There are no steps that could be taken because no one fully disagreed with German Policy.

8 0
3 years ago
When did feudalism begin
OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:

Feudalism started in the 5th century

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following granted relgious freedom to all who professed a belief in Jesus Christ?
    7·2 answers
  • Some native people resisted spanish influence. what was one such group & how did it resist?
    7·2 answers
  • Which best describes the type of government England had in the period before Restoration?
    15·1 answer
  • Select aspects of the Apostle Paul's writing that were presented in the lessons.
    8·2 answers
  • What country did Japan defeat in its FIRST foreign war during the Meiji period?
    11·1 answer
  • What are the positive effect of imperialism to empires and colonies?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the result when a military coup seized power in Ghana?
    12·2 answers
  • What words in the first line of the Declaration of Sentiments are not in the Declaration of Independence?
    10·1 answer
  • Which dynasty used the idea of Confucianism in their society and government in India
    7·1 answer
  • Never mind looooooool
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!