The question is incomplete. Here is the complete question
Suppose the demand for Digital Video Recorders (DVRs) is given by Q = 250 - .25p + 4pc, where Q is the quantity of DVRs demanded (in 1000s), p is the price of a DVR, and pc is the price of cable television. How much does the quantity demanded for DVRs change if the p rises by $40? A) drops by 10,000 DVRs B) increases by 16,000 DVRs C) drops by 2,500 DVRs D) increases by 4,000
Answer:
Drops by 10,000 DVRs
Explanation:
The demand for digital video recorders is expressed by
Q= 250- .25p+4pc
Where
Q represents the quantity demanded by the customers
P represents the price of DVR
pc represents the price of cable television
Since the factor of p in the expression above is negative, this implies that the quantity of DVR demanded in the market will reduce
If the price of DVR increase by $40, then the quantity demanded will reduce by
= 0.25×40×1000
= 10×1000
= 10,000 units
Hence the quantity of DVRs drops by 10,000 DVRs if the price is increased to $40
Answer:
The statement is describing the functions of police management.
Explanation:
Just like managing a firm, managing the police works in a similar way: police directors have to plan, control, direct, and coordinate all aspects related to the police operations, both on a daily basis, and on a long-term basis.
It is very important to have good police management because police is a service that is public and crucial for citizens. The wrong kind of police management can cause safety and public order problems that can be very disruptive for daily life.
Answer: A. What was your average compounded return per year over a particular period?
Explanation:
Geometric return is calculated by the formula;
= [(1 + r1) * (1 + r2) * (1 + r3) *.... (1 + rn)] ^1/n
This allows for one to calculate the compounding effect over a period of time by showing the compounded annual growth rate which means that it tells what the average compounded return was per year in a particular period.
Answer:
C). to borrow money, limitations intended to protect.
Explanation:
As per the question, the correct statement to replace the underlined phrase would be 'to borrow...to protect' as it is grammatically appropriate and lexically coherent. The first option is incorrect due to the wrong usage of 'being' which disrupts the flow and meaning of the sentence while the second option inaptly employs '-ing' form of the verb('protecting') after the article 'the.' Options 'D' and 'E' are the wrong due to grammatical errors like unnecessary usage of 'of which' and 'for borrowing.' Thus, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
a.Susan is wrong, and Mary is free to disclaim warranties.
Explanation:
According to the Magnuson-Moss Act the seller of a product may or may not provide warranty on a product. But is warranty is provided the following conditions must be met.
- The seller must provide a full or limited warranty.
- The coverage of the warranty must be stated
- Warranty must be available to the customers, so that they can read it before making a purchase.
So Mary can choose to disclaim all warranties on her products, not making her liable for any defects found in them. But if she wants to provide warranty it must be written and follow the conditions stated above.
