Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
Civil society organization is the correct answer.
Civil society organization (CSO), also known as non-governmental organization, is a group of people within society that unite with the primary purpose of asserting their political rights and seeking recognition within the state by challenging inequities regarding human rights, environment, anti-corruption and labor standards.
Answer:
B. because it reduces the amount of electricity generated by hydropower
Explanation:
<span>A "push" poll is a form of negative campaigning that masquerades as a regular opinion survey.
Push polling includes the utilization of telemarketing firms for the benefit of a presidential battle, however guaranteeing objectivity in leading a free popular supposition study. Perceiving that voters had turned out to be very comfortable with general sentiment surveys, battle supervisors contemplated that it may be conceivable to change a conclusion survey into an instrument of political influence.
</span>
