Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
24 cubes
Step-by-step explanation:
You can figure this a couple of ways.
I usually find it easiest to figure in terms of the number of cubes each dimension represents. The vertical dimension (3/2 cm) is the length of 3 cubes; the front-back dimension (2 cm) is the length of 4 cubes, and the width (1 cm) is the length of 2 cubes.
The total number of cubes required is the product of the dimensions in cube-lengths: 3×4×2 = 24 cubes.
__
Another way to figure this is to compute the prism volume in the given dimensions (cm³) and the cube volume in the same dimensions, then find the number of cube volumes in the prism volume.
Prism volume = l×w×h = (2 cm)(1 cm)(3/2 cm) = 3 cm³
Cube volume = (1/2 cm)³ = 1/8 cm³
Then the number of cubes that will fit in the prism is ...
(3 cm³)/(1/8 cm³) = 3×8 = 24 . . . . cubes
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Convert the mixed number into improper fraction
To multiply one fraction by another, multiply the numerators for the numerator, and multiply the denominator for its denominator and reduce the fraction obtained after multiplication into lowest term
Convert the improper fraction into mixed number
Hope I helped!
Best regards! :D
Answer:
Pete
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
Mandy's Estimate :
Number of spins , n = 20
Pete's Estimate:
Number of spins, n = 200
A good probability estimate is one which has narrow margin of error with a high degree of confidence. These two variables are affected by sample size.
A high sample size give a narrower margin of error and increases the confidence level probability
Based on the sample size used by each of Pete and Mandy, we can conclude that, Pete's probability estimate would be better due to its significantly higher sample size.
