Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
the answer to your question is a waterclock, hope that helped :-)
The correct answer is token economy. This is a system that
is defined as a kind of contingency management by which is being based on the
systematic reinforcement based on the targeted behavior and that the reinforcers
are likely to be referred to as symbols or tokens in exchanged for other reinforcers.
<span>I am thinking they have full power to levy war, and to conclude peace.</span>
The Constitution is the foundation of our government and the framework of our governmental system.
