Answer
I would stop playing and leave with the $10000 free of tax
Explanation
The truth in such games is that they are not designed to be exactly 50/50. There are possibilities for outcomes that will tie or loose. Furthermore, a game that is really 50/50, the house will deduct some commission. These games always have a room for the house advantage, thus for me, I will just go with $10000 fortune!
Answer:
C) 4.2 years
Explanation:
The computation of the payback period is as follows;
As we know that
Payback Period = Initial cost ÷ Annual net cash flow
Here
Initial cost = $278000
Annual net cash flow = Incremental after tax + Depreciation per year
where,
Depreciation per year = (Original cost - Salvage value) ÷ Estimated Life
= ($278,000 - $30,000) ÷ 8 years
= $31,000
Annual net cash flow is
= $35000 + $31000
= $66000
So,
Payback Period is
= $278000 ÷ $66000
= 4.2 Years
The second deal focused on social welfare to ease the problem brought by the great depression. The goals were: social securities for retirement, employment for those who are unemployed; health services, housing for illegal settlers and improvement on national resources.
Answer:
The correct answer is D. Choices that are the best for more than one person are said to be in the social interest.
Explanation:
The social interest is a concept sufficiently clarified in Company Law. The Capital Companies Law refers to it in terms of challenging social agreements: if an agreement is not in accordance with the corporate interest, it can be challenged. It is only negatively contested, that is, if the plaintiff can argue that the agreement is contrary to the social interest, so that it is not a validity requirement that the agreement be in accordance with the social interest. Likewise, if the administrators act against the social interest when they exercise their discretionary powers, they incur responsibility for violation of their duty of loyalty.
Answer: D. The investor has no tax liability on distributions received, and the investment company has no tax liability on retained income
Explanation:
Municipal Securities are exempt of Federal taxes and this is what makes them most attractive. An investor in a mutual fund which invests solely in municipal securities will therefore not have any tax liability because their returns would be based on securities that are federally tax exempt. The same goes for any income the Mutual fund intends to retain.
