Answer:
(a) = $468
(b) = 52%
(c) = $144
(d) = 28%
(e) = $1150
(f) = $920
Explanation:
selling price variable cost contribution margin contribution ratio
1. $900 $432 (a) $ (b)%
2. $200 $ (c) $56 (d)%
3. $ (e) $(f) $230 20%
contribution = selling price - variable costs
Margin contribution ratio = contribution / sales
Variable cost = selling price - contribution
Selling price = contribution / margin contribution ratio
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The concept of "Nash equilibrium" is been by economist and also by "gamers" in game theory. Nash equilibrium is so good for making decisions and the determination of strategies.
In playing this game, the players or participants can use the pure strategy or the mixed strategy. The mixed strategy is the use of different strategies randomly.
"If a player chooses a mixed strategy in a Nash equilibrium, this implies that the payoff from using that mixed strategy is the same as the payoff from using any of the pure strategies in it".
The statement given above is FALSE because the PAYOFF WILL INCREASE IF WE ARE TO PLAY A MIXED STRATEGY.
For instance if we have a head of 1 and -1, and a tail of -1 and 1, the payoff for pure strategy is likely one or minus one but for a mixed strategy it could be zero.
By providing the letter with her maximum loan amount Margot risks reducing her negotiating ability
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a pre-approval letter?</h3>
Generally, A letter from a lender that states that the lender is willing to lend to you in the event of prequalification or preapproval is a document that states the lender is willing to lend to you up to a particular loan amount.
This is not a guaranteed loan offer, and the document that you are looking at is based on certain assumptions.
In conclusion, Margot runs the risk of decreasing her capacity to negotiate by diminishing her leverage by submitting the letter with the maximum loan amount.
Read more about the pre-approval letter
brainly.com/question/28221419
#SPJ1
Answer:
Intrinsic value: $ 45.19290274
The stock is undervalued as is selling for less.
Explanation:
We use the gordon model to solve for the intrinsic value of the share.
we must solve for the grow rate like it was an interest rate:
<u>grow rate: </u>
![2.00 \times (1+g)^{10} = 3.16\\\sqrt[10]{\frac{3.16}{2.00}} -1 = g](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2.00%20%5Ctimes%20%281%2Bg%29%5E%7B10%7D%20%3D%203.16%5C%5C%5Csqrt%5B10%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B3.16%7D%7B2.00%7D%7D%20-1%20%3D%20g)
g = 0.046804808
<u>dividends one year from now:</u>
3.16 x (1 + 0.046804808) = 3.307903193
Now we calculate the instrinsic value:
Value: $ 45.19290274
The stock is undervalued as is selling for less.
Answer:
Sun Smarts Solar installs solar panels in large newly constructed buildings. The company employs several expert installers who work on a full-time basis. Although the installation team works every day, the company pays them at the end of the month, for the previous month's work. Employee salaries are recorded as long-term liabilities on Sun Smarts's balance sheet.
