A rich politician/Sponsor or the Emperor
The name of the soldier who hailed from Northfield, MN. and was killed in action on October 9, 1944, is Sergeant Charles J. Scheopf
<h3>Who is Charles Schpeof?</h3>
This refers to a World War II soldier from Northfield, MN that died at 22 years old as part of the invading force on Germany and killed in action on October 9, 1944.
Hence, we can see that from the given details, it is easy to infer that the soldier being mentioned is Sergeant Charles J. Scheopf who alongside thousands of others were killed in the attempted invasion of Germany on the first day of <em>Operation Varsity.</em>
Read more about World War II here:
brainly.com/question/1174232
#SPJ1
It is a form of government in which __________________....
Basically, it’s the act of not meeting the required obligations of a specific loan that you are in charge of paying.
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
