Which of the following statements would be made by someone arguing against new nuclear power plants? A. Nuclear energy is too ex
pensive to use, so most consumers would not be able to afford it. B. Nuclear energy cannot be extracted and placed on the market as quickly as fossil fuels can be.
C. Nuclear energy production produces a security risk, and many communities do not wish to have a plant nearby.
D. Nuclear energy is no better for the environment than fossil fuels.
Nuclear energy production produces a security risk, and many communities do not wish to have a plant nearby
Explanation:
Nuclear energy is generated by the breakdown of atom into smaller parts, this process is called nuclear fission, the reaction produces energy which can be use to generate electricity. During the process, atoms that are radioactive gives off part of their nuclear energy as radiation, this nuclear radiation has a very harmful effect on humans and the environment if it is not well contained, hence the reason why the production of a nuclear energy poses a potential security threat to any community near the nuclear power plants.
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option C. The statement that would be made by someone arguing against new nuclear power plants is that n<span>uclear energy production produces a security risk, and many communities do not wish to have a plant nearby.</span>
Answer: Preferably Executive But they have to be approved by the senate.
Explanation: The U.S. President is in the Category as Executive same as a member of the Judicial College. They constitution would have to be approved by an executive group.
Civil Rights Movement in Florida. The Civil Rights Movement began when black Americans were not treated with the same fairness and equality as white Americans. This is called discrimination. Even after the Civil War ended and slaves were freed by President Lincoln, it would take black Americans (African Americans) many years
Please sum it up in your own words, have an awesome day!
Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable