Answer: 1. a. The existence of a no-fault law.
2. d. $17,000
Explanation:
1. For Jane to prove that Famous was indeed negligent, she definitely does not need the No - Fault law. This is a law that is mostly applicable to motor vehicle accidents and means that the individual parties are responsible for whatever injuries they sustain and the person who actually caused the accident is irrelevant. The main aim of this is to reduce the damages claims that one can be put on Insurance which increase insurance premiums.
<em>If this law was to be applied here, Jane would</em> <em>be responsible for her own injuries and her suit would fail. </em>
2. Jane missed 2 weeks of work and in each week she earns $5,000.
She also had medical expenses of $4,000 and estimated pain and suffering of $3,000.
The general damages therefore are the two weeks she missed plus the medical expenses and the pain and suffering.
= 5,000 ( 2) + 4,000 + 3,000
= 10,000 + 7,000
= $17,000
Answer: 3.50 years
Explanation:
The Payback period is a method of checking the viability of a project. It measures how long it will take a project to pay back it's initial investment.
Formula is;
= Year before payback + Cash remaining till payback/ Cash inflow in year of payback
Year 1 Net Cash Inflow
= Cash Inflow - Cash Outflow
= 30,000 - 12,000
= $18,000
Year 2
= 45,000 - 20,000
= $25,000
Year 3
= 60,000 - 25,000
= $35,000
Year 4
= 50,000 - 30,000
= $20,000
Year 1 + 2 + 3
= 18,000 + 25,000 + 35,000
= $78,000
Amount remaining till payback
= Investment - Cash inflow so far
= 88,000 - 78,000
= $10,000
= Year before payback + Cash remaining till payback/ Cash inflow in year of payback
= 3 + 10,000/20,000
= 3.50 years
Answer: It says goals can be classified as : futuristic,psychological, or educational (then ) , recreational , occupational, or personal
this is the correct answer
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes, Stock A has higher dividend yield
Explanation:
given data
market risk premium = 6.0%
risk-free rate = 6.4%
A B
Beta 1.10 0.90
Constant growth rate 7 % 7%
to find out
does stock A has higher dividend yield than Stock B
solution
we get here Stock A rA = 6.4% + 1.1 × 6%
Stock A rA = 13.00%
and
Dividend yield of stock A = rA - g
Dividend yield of stock A = 13.00% - 7%
Dividend yield of stock A = 6%
and
for Stock B rB = 6.4%+ .9 × 6%
Stock B rB = 11.80%
and
Dividend yield of stock B = rA - g
Dividend yield of stock B = 11.80% - 7%
Dividend yield of stock B = 4.80%
so we can say Yes, Stock A has higher dividend yield
Answer:
is not efficient because firms can have different costs of reducing pollution.
Explanation:
Economic efficiency is the way a business maximises the use of factors of production (land, labor, capital) to produce output at a reduced cost. Efficiency aims to improve output and reduce cost to the barest minimum.
In this instance to individual cost required to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions is not considered by the government.
Since reduction of sulfur dioxide is equal among firms, some smaller ones may incur cost that will financially impair them and put them out of business.
While bigger firms will easily bear the cost.
