Answer:
Provide an opportunity for the patient to talk about concerns
Explanation:
More often than not, details regarding incoming surgeries are unaddressed without any ill intention, but just because the physician is not aware of some of the patient's worries.
In fact a recent study carried on by listening to a series of audio recordings of patient-physician visits provided an insight that also showed that some behaviors in the pre-op consultation lead to the patient not disclosing all of his/her concern. For example, physicians often redirect patients at the beginning of the visit, giving patients less than 30 seconds to express their concerns.
By including the patient in the decision making process, showing empathy, giving clinical recommendations, going through the surgery's agenda with the patient, and giving the patient time and patience to talk about concerns, the pre-op fear will be reduced and even the post-op treatment has more chances of being completed to the letter.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": cumulative preferred stock that have been declared but have not been paid.
Explanation:
Dividends in arrears are dividends that have not been paid in a period on cumulative preferred stock. A company does not necessarily have to pay dividends to its shareholders but the payment becomes cumulative. Under this situation, it is said that the organization has failed to generate enough cash during the year. Besides, there must be a dividend declaration for the dividends in arrears to be liable recognized.
Answer:
A resposta é b) II E III APENAS
Explanation:
Answer:
Correct Answer is Option c
It is efficient to build the fence.
(The net profit is 100 to each for an entire of 200 and the cost is 150, consequently it is efficient. For example both contribute 75, and their evaluation is 100 so both are better off with the barrier built)
a) and b) are incorrect as disbursing more than the own evaluation is not a firmly conquered strategy and each player giving 100 will be corresponding to a total of 200 and it is not a Nash equilibrium as both can reduction what they pay and be better off.
d) There are Nash equilibria in which the fence is not built. (Assume one is paying 0, then the cost to be reserved up by the other one will be 150 and the evaluation is 100, so both paying 0 will be a Nash equilibria as neither have any inducement to deviate and pay alone).
