Answer:
Option C is the correct option.
Explanation:
As the rights and obligation of the antique rocking chair are been passed to third party, so the damage caused by the checque been bounced is the monetry consideration agreed between the party to the contract, McGraw and Tellis. So Tellis may recover money damages from McGraw. However there is a special condition that can allow Tellis recover his asset from Rio if the third party knew before purchase of this asset, that the checque paid to Tellis by McGraw was dishonoured but still he contracted with McGraw to acquire the antique rocking chair.
Overall the option C is the correct option with which the case scenario relates.
You should invest your money to save for future projects or maybe you need it for a life emergency.
Answer: d) Analyze the bad news to see how it will affect his reader.
Explanation:
The first thing that Taylor should do is to analyze the bad news so that he can predict the likely effect on the client.
Once he predicts this, he can be able to deliver the bad news in such a way that the client would not be too annoyed by it. It would also allow him to offer alternatives that might be applicable and doable to the client.
Answer:
The correct answer is b. $30,000.
Explanation:
The depreciation is systematic allocation of cost of asset over its useful life. In straight line method cost is allocated evenly during the period of asset usage. Detail calculations are given below.
Depreciation expense = Cost of asset/Useful Life
= 90,000/3
= 30,000
Final offer arbitration is often regarded as a public process only meant for disputes that are monetary in nature.
The true statements about final offer arbitration are:
- It reduces the chilling effect of conventional arbitration.
- It requires the arbitrator to select between the union's or the employer's final offer
Final offer arbitration as a public process when applied to individual is used when an individual and the other party want to a dispute are are unable to resolve the matter through mediation.
In final-offer arbitration, the two parties that are involved in the dispute often submit final offers to an arbitrator.
The arbitrator then chooses the binding solution that matches the one that is closest to his own view of the right outcome
Learn more from
brainly.com/question/13873133
