Answer:
In the description section underneath the overview per the particular context is illustrated.
Explanation:
- Wanda's philosophy about becoming a distributer of enhance performance resulted in increased market demand due to consumer perception that her goods are stronger and therefore more advantageous.
- This contributes to consumption growth, moving the consumer surplus towards Wanda's goods to the right, contributing towards increased costs.
- One more scenario maybe though in the immediate future, her Wanda commodities demonstrate no positive effects, resulting throughout a decline in terms of trade.
Throughout this situation, Wanda might answer by genuinely changing the productivity of the latter's goods including displaying a certain clinical significance to obtain a competitive advantage for customers.
Answer:
Sales price variance = $1,900.
Explanation:
We know,
Sales price variance = (Standard sales price - Actual sales price) × Actual sales quantity
Given,
Standard sales price = $1.79 per unit.
Actual sales price = $1.59 per unit.
Actual sales quantity = 9,500 units.
Putting the values into the formula, we can get
Sales price variance = (Standard sales price - Actual sales price) × Actual sales quantity
or, Sales price variance = ($1.79 - $1.59) × 9,500
or, Sales price variance = $0.2 × 9,500
or, Sales price variance = $1,900.
<span>it only takes one
things happen
exclusions apply
</span><span>
</span>
Answer: The answers are provided below
Explanation:
There are several similarities between the project management processes which surround scrum to the traditional project management processes which surrounds a project life cycle such as Waterfall. When one looks at each iteration as a project, one will see that Scrum planning meeting will be identical to planning meeting of the traditional project.
The daily standups in scrum will resemble the monitoring and the controlling of traditional waterfall with the exception that in scrum, its team monitors itself. A sprint would be the execution stage while the sprint review will be like project closure lessons that are learned. Sprint can be seen as small waterfall model project.
However, the main difference is in the scrum's team mindset versus the team of the traditional project management. Also, the process of work defining as being completed is different for the teams. Lastly, the method used by the scrum team in its approaches to work, team collaboration, responsibility acceptance, tasks definition and accountability are different from the traditional project management team.
A hybrid approach will be sensible in a large organization which has pockets of power. This is true for large retails that have old legacy systems in which frequent deployments aren't possible.
This is true for systems in which, testing can't be automated due to the fact that automated testing is a vital part for success for large scrum projects. In such organizations, it is sensible to use scrum for the teams which are able to move to scrum and waterfall can be used for other parts of the organization.
Answer:
Annual depreciation=$188,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Purchasing price= $1,000,000
Salvage value= $60,000
Useful life= 5 years
To calculate the depreciation expense under the straight-line method, we need to use the following formula:
Annual depreciation= (original cost - salvage value)/estimated life (years)
Annual depreciation= (1,000,000 - 60,000)/5
Annual depreciation=$188,000
