1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lutik1710 [3]
4 years ago
11

What is the solution to 2x+5>3x+1

Mathematics
2 answers:
frez [133]4 years ago
7 0
   2x + 5 > 3x + 1
<u> - 2x        - 2x      </u>
           5 > x + 1
         <u>- 1        - 1</u>
           4 > x
           x < 4
Colt1911 [192]4 years ago
4 0

The solution is 4>x Because you subtract 1 from both sides and you subtract 2x from both sides and you get x<4 or 4>x
You might be interested in
HELPME PLEASE BRAINLIEST
Komok [63]

Answer:

D is the answer. Djeifuuft

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the number property of 17+0
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

The identity property

Step-by-step explanation:

anything added to 0 is itself.

8 0
3 years ago
Which choice most effectively sets up the
tatiyna

Option D. However, despite its many utilitarian benefits, colleges have not always supported the study of philosophy.

Which choice most effectively sets up the information that follows?

  • Despite philosophy teaching useful tools for academic and professional achievement, only 18 percent of the American colleges incorporated the course within curriculum, thus indicating their lack of support.
  • Hence, Option D is correct. The other  options do not express this condition.

To know more about reading comprehension, refer:

brainly.com/question/23343740

#SPJ4

6 0
2 years ago
How can i draw this?
mylen [45]
The green arrow thing is a ray. So, question b. is a ray. So the dot would be B and the arrow would be C. 

3 0
3 years ago
An employer uses the linear regression equation y = 0.18 x + 320.22 to predict the weekly salary, y, of an employee who sells x
Nata [24]

Answer:

Option C is correct.

Alex earned about $60 more than Joaquin did.

Step-by-step explanation:

The linear regression equation

y = 0.18 x + 320.22

is used to predict the weekly salary, y, of an employee who sells x dollars worth of merchandise.

Joaquin sold $1500 worth of goods. Meaning that x for that week for Joaquin is 1500.

Joaquin' s salary for that week is then given as

y = 0.18x + 320.22

y = 0.18(1500) + 320.22 = 590.22

Hence, Joaquin's salary for that week = $590.22

Alex earns $650 that week. Meaning that y for Alex in that week = 650

y = 0.18x + 320.22

650 = 0.18x + 320.22

0.18x = 650 - 320.22 = 329.78

x = (329.78/0.18) = 1832.1

Hence, Alex sold goods worth $1832.1 that week.

Joaquin sold goods worth $1500

Joaquin earned $590.22

Alex sold goods worth $1832.1

Alex earned $650

From this calculation, it is evident that 'Alex earned about $60 more than Joaquin did' is the correct option as $650 is about $60 more than $590.22

Hope this Helps!!!

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the value of x?
    9·2 answers
  • Meg has a new bookcase for her bedroom with 6 shelved meg has 50 books about how many books will fit on each shelf
    5·2 answers
  • Over a 3/12 year period, 27/12 inches of snow fell in Jackson City. What was the average yearly snowfall in Jackson City?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following quantities are continuous?
    12·2 answers
  • In Oregon, the mean annual rainfall in Rockaway Beach is 118.88 inches and the mean annual rainfall in Falls City is 122.28 inch
    13·2 answers
  • Type the correct answer in each box. Use numerals instead of words. If necessary, use / for the fraction bar(s). Rewrite the fol
    11·1 answer
  • Find three consecutive even numbers whose sum is 1674.
    6·1 answer
  • What is the difference between prime factors and odd numbers​
    10·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with this math homework please!
    14·2 answers
  • I need help on the values on these questions?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!