All categories

3 years ago

Missy rolls two 6 sided number cubes labeled 1-6. What is the probability that both number cubes land on a prime number

Mathematics

1 answer:

WITCHER [35]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

There is a 1/4 chance of Missy rolling a prime number on both cubes.

Step-by-step explanation:

Rolling one 6-sided cube, Missy has a 3/6 or 1/2 chance of landing on a prime number because the prime numbers between 1 and 6 (inclusive) are 2,3 and 5. When Missy rolls 2, 6-sided cubes, however, the chances of that happening lessens, and we multiply 1/2 by 1/2 as a result. Therefore, when Missy rolls two 6-sided cubes, there is a 1/4 chance of Missy rolling a prime number on both cubes.

You might be interested in

What 2 fingers should you use to properly check your pulse?

lesya692 [45]

Your middle finger and index/pointer.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Compute the sum of all nine 2-digit numbers with a ones digit of 6.

serg [7]

Answer: 504

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Yesterday, there were 56 problems assigned for math homework. Desmond got 14 problems correct and 42 problems incorrect. What pe

Vika [28.1K]

Answer: 25%

100/56 = 1.785714285714286

1.785714285714286 x 14 = 25

6 0

3 years ago

Please help will give branlist

nata0808 [166]

Answer:

The file will help

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Beth says that the graph of g(x) = + 1 is a translation of 5 units to the left and 1 unit up of f(x) = . She continues to explai

Nata [24]

Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect

<h3>Complete question</h3>

Beth says that the graph of g(x)=x-5+1 is a translation of 5 units to the left and 1 unit up of f(x) = x. She continues to explain that the point (0,0) on the square root function would be translated to the point (-5,1) on the graph of g(x). Is Beth's description of the transformation correct? Explain

<h3>How to determine the true statement?</h3>

The functions are given as:

g(x) = x - 5 + 1

f(x) = x

When the function f(x) is translated 5 units left, we have:

f(x + 5) = x + 5

When the above function is translated 1 unit up, we have:

f(x + 5) + 1 = x + 5 + 1

This means that the actual equation of g(x) should be

g(x) = x + 5 + 1

And not g(x) = x - 5 + 1

By comparison;

g(x) = x - 5 + 1 and g(x) = x + 5 + 1 are not the same

Hence, Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect