Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

6

please help asappp!!! i need serious help with this pleaseee. whoever finishes it first and completes it and show how you got it

will get brainliest.

1 answer:

deff fn [24]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Think of even square roots close to 27: the closest is 25 which has a square root of 5. Now think of the number with an even square root after 25: 36 which has a square root of 6. Since 27 is between 25 and 36, the square root of 27 would be between 5 and 6.

You might be interested in

Please help me with this .

solniwko [45]

Answer:

x=4

Step-by-step explanation:

It's a parallel line so the equation is

100+19x+4=180

19x=180-100-4

19x=76

x=76/19

x=4

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is 16/1000 simplified?

nataly862011 [7]

Answer= 8/125 or 0.016
16/1000 can be simplified by dividing both the numerator and denominator by 8

16 2
____=___
1000 125

2/125=0.016

3 0

3 years ago

The circumference of the equator of a sphere was measured to be 82 82 cm with a possible error of 0.5 0.5 cm. Use linear approxi

True [87]

Answer:

The maximum error in the calculated surface area is approximately 8.3083 square centimeters.

Step-by-step explanation:

The circumference ( $s$ ), in centimeters, and the surface area ( $A_{s}$ ), in square centimeters, of a sphere are represented by following formulas:

$A_{s} = 4\pi\cdot r^{2}$ (1)

$s = 2\pi\cdot r$ (2)

Where $r$ is the radius of the sphere, in centimeters.

By applying (2) in (1), we derive this expression:

$A_{s} = 4\pi\cdot \left(\frac{s}{2\pi} \right)^{2}$

$A_{s} = \frac{s^{2}}{\pi^{2}}$ (3)

By definition of Total Differential, which is equivalent to definition of Linear Approximation in this case, we determine an expression for the maximum error in the calculated surface area ( $\Delta A_{s}$ ), in square centimeters:

$\Delta A_{s} = \frac{\partial A_{s}}{\partial s} \cdot \Delta s$

$\Delta A_{s} = \frac{2\cdot s\cdot \Delta s}{\pi^{2}}$ (4)

Where:

$s$ - Measure circumference, in centimeters.

$\Delta s$ - Possible error in circumference, in centimeters.

If we know that $s = 82\,cm$ and $\Delta s = 0.5\,cm$ , then the maximum error is:

$\Delta A_{s} \approx 8.3083\,cm^{2}$

The maximum error in the calculated surface area is approximately 8.3083 square centimeters.

6 0

2 years ago

Find all the factors of 45

scoundrel [369]

Answer:

So, the factors of 45 are 1, 3, 5, 9, 15 and 45.

Common Factors.

Prime Numbers.

Highest Common Factor.

Step-by-step explanation:

45 is a composite number. 45 = 1 x 45, 3 x 15, or 5 x 9. Factors of 45: 1, 3, 5, 9, 15, 45. Prime factorization: 45 = 3 x 3 x 5, which can also be written 45 = 3² x 5.

8 0

3 years ago

The mayor of a town has proposed a plan for the annexation of an adjoining community. A political study took a sample of 900 vot

Stells [14]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.75 -0.72}{\sqrt{\frac{0.72(1-0.72)}{900}}}=2.00$

Now we can calculate the p value. Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:

$p_v= P(Z>2) =0.0228$

Since the p value is lower than the significance level of 0.05 we have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion of residents favored annexation is higher than 0.72 or 72%

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

n=900 represent the random sample selected

$\hat p=0.75$ estimated proportion of residents favored annexation

$p_o=0.72$ is the value that we want to test

represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic

$p_v$ represent the p value

Hypothesis to test

The political strategist wants to test the claim that the percentage of residents who favor annexation is above 72%.:

Null hypothesis: $p\leq 0.72$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.72$

The statistic for this case is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

Replacing the data given we got:

$z=\frac{0.75 -0.72}{\sqrt{\frac{0.72(1-0.72)}{900}}}=2.00$

Now we can calculate the p value. Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:

$p_v= P(Z>2) =0.0228$

Since the p value is lower than the significance level of 0.05 we have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion of residents favored annexation is higher than 0.72 or 72%

3 0

3 years ago