Though I am answering this through logic and my knowledge on history. I would believe making colonies was the answer. Because of England's particular involvement with colonies. Colonies made loads of money especially with high taxes they imposed upon their colonies. England was not just out of money with a exploration route its upkeep for military and Empire grew. Its many wars took a toll on their coffers and the money vanished until colonies were "founded".
It was not fishing because England was already an island and fish was easily accessible and not a commodity. Entering the fur trade was not much of England's sights before the establishment of colonies so this is a trick answer. Looting Spanish ships? No. They had a huge navy and so did Spain. England were not pirates and looting Spanish ships would be called an act of war. Not really going to help the money situation. So making colonies helps. It checks all the things they want. Make Spain mad without an act of war, more food and commodities, which means more money. Making a world dominated empire that strikes fear into most countries. Being unrivaled for the most part is quite good in a dog eat dog world. Good thing England then became something larger than dogs.
Answer: The Masoretic text tradition.
Explanation:
The two largest general textual traditions are the Septuagint and the Masoretic text traditions.
The first book of the Septuagint were likely translated during the 2nd BC, while the oldest extant manuscript of the Masoretic text dates as far back as 9BC.
The very first known group were the Pelasgians.
Answer:
"In international environmental agreements, the idea that scientific uncertainty should not be used as an excuse for inaction is known as:" <u>The precautionary approach.</u>
Explanation:
The precautionary approach is ability to asserts that the burden of proof for potentially harmful actions by industry or government rests on the assurance of safety. And that, when there are threats of serious damages, scientific uncertainty must be resolved in favor of prevention.
