Can you post a pic so I can see more of it.
Answer:
In the clarification section down, the definition including its concern is mentioned.
Explanation:
In terms of strategy, two important components necessarily entail an "Agreement."
<u>Step 1:</u> Approval + Bid = Agreement
<u>Step 2: </u>Agreement + Enforceability = Contract.
- Throughout water to establish a legal Arrangement or Contract, those would be the two underlying equations to be met.
- Going to come to something like the case's reality, The counsel for Kemper addressed to Statewide Claims Management, Brown's insurance company agent, calling for "all the premium money something which Mr. Brown seems to be under his insurance contract."
- Statewide decided to send the document and perhaps freedom of the individual to Kemper throughout reaction to the aforementioned request, however, they pointed to Kemper's current requirement that she should put money during an emergency fund concerning anything and everything outstanding liens.
- Kemper disagreed with all of the above assumptions as well as denied the proposal, arguing that perhaps the response from Nationwide was a counteroffer. If we correctly examine the aforementioned situation, without even any discussion, we will realize that it is indeed a pure "Counter Bid."
- Why whenever the offender becomes encouraged with just 2 choices, YES/NO, whenever an Offeror makes an object to something like the Offeree. and then when the promise offers a conditional response, it destroys the initial offer so it corresponds to Counter Offer.
- In quite a similar manner, the Nationwide reaction to Kemper's letter here alone leads to "Counter Bid" and becomes an Absolute acceptance, but not. i.e., there is no approval of an invitation, and no deal remains.
There is, however, no "Acceptance" to either the original Bid, and therefore no binding mediation agreements between Nationwide and Kemper have been established.
Answer:
A. $1,054.00
B. $ 450.00
Explanation:
Calculation to Determine the unemployment taxes (FUTA and SUTA) that would be paid by each company.
Calculation for Rowland Construction Company unemployment taxes for (FUTA and SUTA)
FUTA tax $7,000 × 0.006
FUTA tax = $42.00
SUTA tax $22,000 × 0.046
SUTA tax = $1,012.00
Hence,
Unemployment taxes=FUTA tax+SUTA tax
Let plug in the formula
Unemployment taxes=$42.00+$1,012.00
Unemployment taxes= $1,054.00
Therefore Rowland Construction Company unemployment taxes for (FUTA and SUTA) will be $1,054.00
b.
Calculation for Ford Improvement Company unemployment taxes for (FUTA and SUTA)
FUTA tax $7,000 × 0.006
FUTA tax = $ 42.00
SUTA tax $8,000 × 0.051
SUTA tax = 408.00
Hence,
Unemployment taxes=FUTA tax+SUTA tax
Let plug in the formula
Unemployment taxes=$42.00+$408.00
Unemployment taxes= $450.00
Therefore Rowland Construction Company unemployment taxes for (FUTA and SUTA) will be $450.00
Take note that FUTA tax amount for both is $7,000 while the tax rate 0.006
Answer:
Operating Activities
Received cash payments from customers.
Purchased inventories with cash.
Paid cash interest on outstanding notes.
Paid accounts payable with cash.
Investing Activities
Sold stock investments for cash.
Received cash from sale of equipment.
Received cash dividends from investments.
Financing Activities
Received cash from short-term debt issuance.
Paid cash dividends.
Received cash from long-term debt issuance.
Explanation:
Operating Activities consist of trading activities of the business.
Investing Activities consists of acquisition and sale of investments
Financing Activities costs of sourcing and repayments of sources of finance
I would say that the answer is true.
