It is a true statement that the three-fifths compromise lasted until the fourteenth amendment declared that everyone would be counted as a whole person.
<h3>
What was the three-fifths compromise?</h3>
It was the compromise agreement between delegates from the North and South at the Constitutional Convention (1787) that the three-fifths of the slave population would be counted for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives.
However, this method of counting 3/5 of slaves for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives lasted until the fourteenth amendment declared that everyone would be counted as a whole person.
Read more about three-fifths compromise
brainly.com/question/535544
#SPJ1
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"Dr. Parrett is a sports psychologist for a large Southern university. The provost and chancellor have asked him to examine the relationship between athletic performance and academic stress at the university. For example, is it the case that the most talented athletes experience the greatest concern over their grades? The provost and chancellor have made it clear to Dr. Parrett that they want a large amount of external validity in the study. He has valid and reliable measures of both athletic performance and academic stress. He knows that he does not have the time or the money to study the entire population of interest.
Imagine that Dr. Parrett wants to use a nonrepresentative sampling technique. Name the three types of nonprobability sampling and explain how each one could be used by Dr. Parrett."
Answer:
The four types of nonprobability sampling are convenience sampling, purposive sampling, quota sampling, and snowball sampling.
Explanation:
Convenience sampling: Allows a selection to be made of a small sample of the target population of the research. This sample is made up of individuals who are available and accessible to research and not through statistical criteria. Regarding the question above, Dr. Parrett can select the athletes he knows and who would like to participate in the research.
Purposive sampling: It allows the sample to be controlled whenever a certain manipulation is possible to generate expected and known results. In the case of the question above, Dr Parrett can search for specific athletes, with characteristics that will generate an expected result in the research.
Snowball sampling: Allows the individuals who make up the sample to invite other individuals to compose the sample, who in turn can invite other individuals. In the case of the question above, Dr. Parret can invite the athletes he wants and ask them to call friends to participate in the survey as well.
Sampling quota: Allows the individuals who will compose the sample to be selected due to their characteristics and qualities. Regarding the question above, Dr. Parrett could only summon athletes with high marks.
Answer:
Two advantages of limiting terms of government offices are to curb corruption and increase public accountability.
Explanation:
Limiting the term that public officials can serve in government positions can make the administration of public offices more transparent because it discourages corruption as no official is seated for very long in any one public office. The rules and regulations are kept transparent and no one can change the terms of administration to favor themselves for longer terms in office. One of the disadvantages is that long term policy decisions are less likely to be implemented and public officials build less expertise in state administration. There can also be talented administrators who have to leave their positions because of the term limits and this is a loss of talent for the state.
Most members of society follow norms without conscious thought. However, not everyone internalizes all of society's norms. Some people must be motivated by sanctions. These are rewards or punishments used to enforce conformity to norms. There are positive sanctions, actions that reward a particular kind of behavior, and negative sanctions, punishments or the threats of punishment used to enforce conformity. In addition, there are formal and informal sanctions. Formal sanctions are rewards or punishments given by a formal organization or regulatory agency. Informal sanctions are spontaneous expressions of approval or disapproval given by an individual or a group.
