Answer:
<em>overexpectation </em>
Explanation:
<em>Overexpectation effect: </em><em>In psychology, the term "overexpectation effect" is defined as the phenomenon that tends to occur when a researcher finds the declination of response to a very well established CS or conditioned stimulus that have been encountered with further reinforcement training with respect to each other. The overexpectation effect has been widely studied by a psychologist named Ivan Pavlov who is responsible for setting up the pattern for studying and then explaining the response loss.</em>
<em>In reference to the question, the given statement represents the overexpectation effect.</em>
The racial or ethnic group that has been the most privileged racial or ethnic group in the United States has been the d. white Anglo-Saxon Protestants.
<h3>Which group is most privileged in the United States?</h3>
In the United States, White people have generally been more privileged than other races. However, even within White people, there are racial or ethnic groups that have been more privileged than others.
A prime example is the White Anglo - Saxon Protestant population. This group is the most privileged in American history. The simple reason for this is that they are the descendants of the British colonists who established the United States and so they have led the nation socially since then.
Find out more on Anglo - Saxons at brainly.com/question/21171132
#SPJ1
They wanted to expand their empire, they wanted to increase their power, and they also wanted to increase their wealth.
Pearl harbor which happened on December 7th 1943? I'm not sure the year but yea
Answer:
<h3>I think this might help you</h3><h3>
Explanation:</h3><h3 />
<h3>With the flu season swiftly approaching and the H1N1 already affecting large numbers across the world, New Hampshire faces the possibility of a flu epidemic. In such an instance, what action would the state or federal government take? The possibility of a massive quarantine gets thrown around every time a flu epidemic exists, but is such an action an infringement of the rights of individuals living in a free nation? Or is the common good of preventing the spread of infection more important?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>Even the current health care debate reflects the tension between individual rights and the common good. Over the past months New Hampshire town halls have been crowded with individuals taking a side in the individual rights/common good debate. Some have expressed the view that health care initiatives are in the interest of a healthier state and nation. Others claim that compulsory health insurance impedes individuals’ right to the best health care money can buy. Can the individual rights vs. common good debate help us understand some of the ideological tension behind the current health care discussion?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>As many of these examples show, this month’s question is largely political, but it can also flow into other areas of thought. There’s the philosophical and moral question of the Donner Party; if you and five others were stranded and starving, and your only hope of getting out alive is to eat the first member who passed away, would you do it to save the rest of the group? There is the question that comes up around the disabled. Do you build special infrastructure to accommodate the few who are disabled even if that meant the cost to do this would jack up prices. Then there is the commercial/environmental side. What is more important, buying a cheaper car that fits your personal budget and your personal tastes or a more expensive and efficient auto that would help save the environment? What do you think?
</h3>
