Answer: Jackie has a strong sense of competence and autonomy, both in her personal life and professionally. Thus, Jackie is also likely to have a high level of Self-esteem
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
Reside. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, arecitizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
Answer:
The answer is A) functionalist
Explanation:
According to the functionalist perspective of racial-ethnic relations suggests that discrimination contributes positively to the dominant group; the group that is not at the receiving end of the discrimination.
Answer:
1) When was the last time you suppressed (deliberately held back) a thought or action? Tell what the nature of the emotion was
- It was last month I held back my anger at my friend.I wanted to shout and scream at her but instead I decided to keep quiet.
We were supposed to meet around nine in the morning and she ended up showing up 2 hours later with no proper excuse .
2) Tell about the context you were in
-She had just finished her exams the day before which made me feel that she probably was tired after a night of studying and the stress of the exams;probably she overslept hence I had to be considerate of her situation.
We were also meeting in town and I personally don't believe in shouting at someone in a public place .
3) How did the situation unfold because of your suppression, how was it made better or worse?
-After a while I was calm , I forgot about it all and we ended up having the fun day that we had planned to have.
4) How would circumstances have unfolded differently if you had acted upon your emotions?
-If I had acted upon my emotions we probably would have fought and left without talking to each other which would have ruined both our day and all the plans we had.
5) How does your experience support or refute this claim\
- I think it depends on the situation of course there are moment where one needs to actual express their emotions otherwise a long time of supressing emotions may lead to serious issues in the future there are situation that may require that someone just burst out their emotions in order to release the stress or the pressure that they are feeling inside .
Explanation:
