This is a condition having tail in a crack.
Explanation:
In the given question, the scenario is that there is a legal restriction, called as entailment, with the Cunningham family, while selling a piece of their land for the purpose of gaining money or profit. According to the legal term, entailment, the owner of the land or house is unable to sell it for profit. The property can only be transferred to the other member of the family.
So now it is a logical example that having a tail in the crack. It means that when tail of an animal is stuck in a crack, that animal is unable to move. So this example best illustrates the situation of the Cunningham Family, as they are facing the entailment, and stuck with the land which they own and which they cannot sell for profit. They do not have any other choice than staying with the land, which means their tail is stuck in the crack.
Learn more about entailment at:
brainly.com/question/13568955
#LearnWithBrainly
Question Options:
a. Authority compliance leadership
b. Team leadership
c. Country club leadership
d. Middle-of-the road leadership
e. Impoverished leadership
Answer: This is an example of MIDDLE OF THE ROAD LEADERSHIP.
Middle of the road leadership style involves a balanced concern for production and people.
This style is also known as the status quo. The managerial grid model is a style leadership model developed by Robert R. Blake and Jane Mouton in 1964.
Managers who use this style hope to achieve suitable performance but often neither production or people needs are met.
Answer:
it depends upon our coming up with the right explanation as one of the candidates
Explanation:
Inference to the best explanation is a term generally in logic or philosophy, which describes a form of inductive reasoning where by individuals draw from the premises about an incident to an explanation for that particular incident.
This explanation is often a claim or reason given, as to why the incident is the way it is. For example: in the occurrence of a particular phenomenon named to be A. Premises B provides the best explanation for A. Therefore, it is most likely that B is true, even though there is no certainty or guarantee of its truth.
Hence, a limitation of inferences to the best explanation is that, "it depends upon our coming up with the right explanation as one of the candidates."
Answer:15
Explanation: you can add 5 three times and u get 15
Answer:
There are two reasons that the author uses to illustrate that the town would be negatively affective if the factory was to close and they are:
Source of income.
Gratitude.
Explanation:
First of all the author starts by saying that he is very thankful for being present in one of the factories that were important because of its production. Then he describes that he would give up his beliefs on tariffs if he saw the effect of the factory on people. Then he interviews different persons and the effect of the factory in their lives. Then they tell him that it is better to have a functional factory than one stopped. That they would gather in the hill it was built in case it burned to ashes, and that they would talk all day about the goods it gave them and how their lives improved after it was placed over there.
