Answer:
Yes (It's more inefficient)
Explanation:
in ecology there are things called primary producers (plants) that are eaten by primary consumers (cows and chickens) and then there are humans, secondary consumers, that eat cows and chickens for energy.
The further we move from eating primary producers the more inefficient we become in consuming energy. Meaning, it requires a lot more natural energy consumption to support a human that lives on meat only as compared to a human that eats plants only. this inefficiency only magnifies when communities practice unsustainable food methods.
There are sustainable ways to eat meat, but (at least in the US) our current conventions of meat production are unsustainable and environmentally destructive.
The answer is "the ice-caps" from the north and south pole.
Answer - D
Gametes always have half the number of chromosomes compared to the somatic cells, hence an unfertilized egg would have half the chromosomes from the mother, and a fertilized egg will contain diploid number of chromosomes. Half of them from inherited from each of the two parents.
Non living things like mountains,oxygen,water.etc
those are nucleotides
since all three of them contain deoxyribose (because there's only one hydroxil group) they are DNA nucleotides
the first nucleotide has cytosine as it's nitrogenous base
the second nucleotide has adenine as it's nitrogenous base
the third nucleotide has thymine as it's nitrogenous base
