Answer:
There was an improvement in accuracy. There was no change in precision.
Explanation:
<em>The average mass after recalibration is closer to the mass of the standard, </em>so the recalibration improved the accuracy<em> </em>(the measurement is closer to an accepted 'true' value).
The standard deviation did not change, so the precision (or how disperse the measurements are) was not affected.
Answer:
you can see the answer at the pic
Answer:
Explanation:
Hello there!
In this case, since the integrated rate law for a second-order reaction is:
Thus, we plug in the initial concentration, rate constant and elapsed time to obtain:
Best regards!
Answer:
0.11mole
Explanation:
Let us assume that the condition is at standard temperature and pressure(STP);
Given parameters:
Volume of water = 2.45L
Unknown:
Number of moles found in this volume of water = ?
Solution;
At STP;
Number of moles =
Input the parameters and solve;
Number of moles of water = = 0.11mole
The number of moles of water found is 0.11mole
First gap is BY USING MAGNETS
2nd is ELECTROLYSIS
3rd is EVAPORATION