Pretty much there has to be a reason and no unusual punishment as in no punishment that is extremely cruel. (Not a good answer but i hope it helps in the slights)
Answer and Explanation:
This means that a theory which leads to imposing moral standards universally without regard to people's historical and psychological differences are based off of subjectivism and lack any form of thorough investigation(normative science). This is self explanatory in the question where it says "...postulates moral truths enunciated by self-evident intuitions that are unchangeable". Moral standards such as this are mostly based on traditions that are subjective and are not given to transparency. This is opposed to when questions may be asked and investigations come into play as to why a particular moral opinion is taken enabling a society appreciate or understand a moral stance based on it's historical, cultural or psychological origins.
<span>Religion was important to the establishment of Hebrew states because they believed that God was their mentor, and to build a civilization correctly, they would need God’s aid to achieve this. Not only was this why, but it was also because they believed in honoring God for all of the opportunities in life they had been given(Such as escaping Egypt).</span>
Answer:
It's still benefited mostly the upper class citizens.
Explanation:
The current system of democracy allow the citizens to buy influence within the government by using their wealth. They did this by donating in Political Action Committee that help a certain candidate win the election.
Because of this, The Rich and Powerful people have more chance to influence the government by electing the candidate that will pass a set of legislation that will benefit them. The poor citizens are not capable to give such donation
