40 ounces is 2.5 pounds because each pound is 16 ounces
The graph is missing, so I am using a graph for a similar question.
It migh even be the same question, but the important thing is that I am going to explain you the situation in several sections of this diagram and so you will be able to work this kind of problems by your selfl.
The graph is attached (see the figure).
The graph shows the evolution of the
speed (vertical-axis) over time (horizontal-axis).In the
section A, the speed increases linearly: so the car is
speeding up uniformly (constant acceleration).
In the
section B, the line is horizontal which shows that the speed is constant. That is a
uniform motion.
In the
section C, the speed is decreasing uniformly, so the car is
slowing down with uniform negative acceleration.
So, for this graph, the answer is:
in the setion C. the car is slowing down (uniformly).
Answer: (a)
P - Value = 0.0981 is high, this indicates stronger evidence that we should fail to reject the null hypothesis: H0: pD = pR (There is no significant difference between the proportion of Democrats who plan to vote for the Democratic candidate in the upcoming election and the proportion of Republicans who plan to vote for the Republican candidate in the upcoming election). P - Value = 0.0981 is the probability of obtaining results at least as extreme as the observed results of the Hypothesis Test, assuming that the null hypothesis is correct.
(b)
Since P - Value = 0.0981 is greater than \alpha = 0.05, the difference is not significant. Fail to reject null hypothesis.
(c)
Since in the Hypothesis Test, we have failed to reject null hypothesis, we could have made: Type II Error: Failure to reject a false null hypothesis. One potential consequence of this error is as follows:
Suppose in reality there is significant difference between the proportion of Democrats who plan to vote for the Democratic candidate in the upcoming election and the proportion of Republicans who plan to vote for the Republican candidate in the upcoming election. But the political pollster wrongly concludes that there is no significant difference between the proportion of Democrats who plan to vote for the Democratic candidate in the upcoming election and the proportion of Republicans who plan to vote for the Republican candidate in the upcoming election. Type II Error is committed in this situation. The consequence of this Type II Error is that the political pollstar will that the political parties are loyal and will not do any follow up work whereas in reality it is not so.
Step-by-step explanation:
got this from chegg!!!
The answer should be $700
Because $12.50 · 56 = $700