1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tatiana [17]
3 years ago
11

The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as ________.

History
1 answer:
nevsk [136]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as an illustration of the widespread hatred of Indians during the Age of Jackson.

Explanation:

When Jackson rose to power the situation with the American Indians was extremely tense. Just a few years before, in 1815, the country began to expand towards the west and ran into the tribes of American Indians who had inhabited the country for centuries. Those occupied lands aroused the desires of the colonies, which initiated a series of campaigns to get the Natives to travel further west in exchange for all economic royalties.

In fact, already during Jefferson's tenure (in office between 1801 and 1809) it had been established that the only natives who could stay east of the Mississippi would be those who had "civilized" and could coexist with the "white man." Based on this, those that had remained in the region were the Chicksaw, Choctaw, Creek, Seminole and Cherokee tribes. These, in exchange for maintaining their territories, had fixed their settlements, tilled the land, divided their land into private property and had adopted democracy. Some became Christian (at least in appearance) so as not to be expelled from the area.

In 1830, just one year after taking power, Jackson decided to solve the Indian problem by the brave. That is, creating a law to deport them further west. That year, the Indian Removal Act was passed, which obliged the Indians to move to lands west of the Mississippi and authorized the president of the United States to act against all those located to the east of the Mississippi river.

Officially, the politician made this decision because of the need for land to produce cotton and for "national security" (to avoid conflicts between Indians and Americans). However, in addition to these two causes and his own racism, Jackson also sought to create a human barrier between the United States and the regions under the control of other transatlantic powers. With them, Jackson not only sought to empty the Indian territories colonized west of the Mississippi Indian conflicts, but also create a security belt to the Spanish and British threat that was still installed in large North American territories.

Regardless of the cause, in practice, tens of thousands of Indians were urged to leave the houses in which they lived (their lands for centuries) to leave for "reserved" territories.

At the official level, Jackson claimed that the natives had the possibility of refusing this "relocation" and keeping their home in the United States. However, the reality was that the government (at the head of which was the president) exerted a brutal pressure on the tribal chiefs to leave. In addition, they made it clear that, in the face of the refusal, they would use force.

You might be interested in
When was the aztect empire formed​
wlad13 [49]

Answer:

1428

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What makes the pyramid unusual among the places on antipater's list
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
Yes, since antiquity is the definition of prayer, what makes the pyramid unusual among the places on the antipater list is its antiquity
6 0
3 years ago
4. What significance does the woman mentioned in the video hold?
ANTONII [103]
I’m sorry but what video
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Attorney General could only ascend to the presidency if __________.
9966 [12]

Answer:

those above him/her couldn't serve

Explanation:

Attorney General is seventh in the line, so it is unlikely that something like this can happen. Still, in the case it happens it will happen only when those above him are not able to perform their duty. Of course this never happened in history.

8 0
3 years ago
Historians have a difficult task, if not all facts have been discovered yet, with doing what ?
Misha Larkins [42]
Hi!

I don't know your options, but I have some suggestions:

if not all the facts have been discovered yet, then the historians will have a hard time interpreting the facts, They will also have a hard time understanding the causes of the events (since they are missing some information)
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ideas that are outlined in the Enlightenment?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the declaration of man rights?
    7·1 answer
  • What are the primary reasons the US government believed it needed to address health care in the United States?
    5·2 answers
  • During the American Revolution, the redcoats
    5·1 answer
  • True or False
    9·2 answers
  •  The Bessemer Process was an innovation in the production of cheaper, stronger
    12·1 answer
  • Why are several parishes in Louisiana exempt from the effects of the proclamation?
    7·1 answer
  • The impulse to learn about one's heritage and share ties with Africa, while also working to eliminate European colonialism, is c
    14·1 answer
  • An amendment to the Maryland Constitution is passed to limit the uses of revenues acquired through casinos and other gambling en
    7·1 answer
  • What occurred after the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!