1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tatiana [17]
3 years ago
11

The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as ________.

History
1 answer:
nevsk [136]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as an illustration of the widespread hatred of Indians during the Age of Jackson.

Explanation:

When Jackson rose to power the situation with the American Indians was extremely tense. Just a few years before, in 1815, the country began to expand towards the west and ran into the tribes of American Indians who had inhabited the country for centuries. Those occupied lands aroused the desires of the colonies, which initiated a series of campaigns to get the Natives to travel further west in exchange for all economic royalties.

In fact, already during Jefferson's tenure (in office between 1801 and 1809) it had been established that the only natives who could stay east of the Mississippi would be those who had "civilized" and could coexist with the "white man." Based on this, those that had remained in the region were the Chicksaw, Choctaw, Creek, Seminole and Cherokee tribes. These, in exchange for maintaining their territories, had fixed their settlements, tilled the land, divided their land into private property and had adopted democracy. Some became Christian (at least in appearance) so as not to be expelled from the area.

In 1830, just one year after taking power, Jackson decided to solve the Indian problem by the brave. That is, creating a law to deport them further west. That year, the Indian Removal Act was passed, which obliged the Indians to move to lands west of the Mississippi and authorized the president of the United States to act against all those located to the east of the Mississippi river.

Officially, the politician made this decision because of the need for land to produce cotton and for "national security" (to avoid conflicts between Indians and Americans). However, in addition to these two causes and his own racism, Jackson also sought to create a human barrier between the United States and the regions under the control of other transatlantic powers. With them, Jackson not only sought to empty the Indian territories colonized west of the Mississippi Indian conflicts, but also create a security belt to the Spanish and British threat that was still installed in large North American territories.

Regardless of the cause, in practice, tens of thousands of Indians were urged to leave the houses in which they lived (their lands for centuries) to leave for "reserved" territories.

At the official level, Jackson claimed that the natives had the possibility of refusing this "relocation" and keeping their home in the United States. However, the reality was that the government (at the head of which was the president) exerted a brutal pressure on the tribal chiefs to leave. In addition, they made it clear that, in the face of the refusal, they would use force.

You might be interested in
A factor that most directly affects the demand for automobiles is
stepladder [879]

The correct answer is individual preferences and tastes of buyers.

When there is increase in demand also the demand curve shifts. If there is a change in factor apart from price then the whole of demand curve shifts.

The income of consumers determines the demand of the commodity. Also prices which are related to goods and also preferences and tastes of the customer.

Demand for automobiles can be elastic where there can be  delay in buying a new vehicle.

Due to many substitutes the model for automobile can be highly elastic.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"There is no Negro problem. There is no Southern problem. There is no Northern problem. There is only an American problem."
Vaselesa [24]
The Correct answer from all the option is option C.)Remeber the point
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After British forces started losing battles in the South, how did neutral colonists react?
devlian [24]
After British forces started losing battles in the South they started to support the patriots. 
Hope this helps!
7 0
3 years ago
Who french and briton fighting on their. side
Scrat [10]
During the war, it was the rebels
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was guilt assigned to Germany?
Tamiku [17]

Answer:

Guilt was assigned to Germany as they caused the most deaths in the war. However, this is somewhat incorrect, because Austria-Hungary caused the war, not Germany.

Explanation:

The Germans had to give up land.

The Polish Corridor split Germany in 2.

It had to pay a massive amount of debt to the allies.

The military was reduced to 100,000 men, no airforce.

The Rhineland was demilitarized.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please help, 12 Points! Hurry!
    15·1 answer
  • How many delegates did trump get in the presidential elections?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following people was the only Irish supporter of Canada confederation
    8·1 answer
  • "What are the differences between the Federalists and Anti-Federalist in ratifying the Constitution?
    15·2 answers
  • What is a check the president has over the legislative branch
    9·1 answer
  • What are the military and economic benefits of the Panama Canal ?
    14·1 answer
  • Bill has read 70 pages and plans to read 25 pages per day while Kate has read 50 pages but plans to read 29 pages per day. How m
    5·2 answers
  • Which one????? Please answer quick
    8·2 answers
  • What is the primary focus of US national security policy?
    13·2 answers
  • Which food item may be handled with bare hands? pickled watermelon for garnish cooked pasta for salad canned tuna for sandwiches
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!