Answer:
The answer is metacognition.
Explanation:
In simple words, metacognition is the process of thinking about the way we think. This can occur when we reflect on our feelings, or when we find the most effective way for us to learn.
When a child learns about multiplications, metacognition occurs after he/she understands the meaning of the concept (some children see it as adding the same number mutiple times).
Answer: The best example of an operant conditioning is option D. Puckering up after tasting a dill pickle.
Explanation: operant conditioning is type of learning in which the desire and the frequency of a behavior depends on the consequences that follows the behavior. Therefore a behaviour that attracts rewarding and beneficial consequences will occur more, than a behaviour that attracts punishment and regrets.
To pucker up after testing a dill pickle means that the dill pickle was favourable and gives a sweet taste. That means a reward was gotten from tasting a dill pickle, this will increase the likelihood of that behaviour to occur, that means the individual will always want to taste a dill pickle.
In this example, Pickering up is the consequences, while tasting a dill pickle is the behavior.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The theory of reasoned action was developed by Michael Fishbein in the year 1967. The theory explains that the attitude of people to certain issues depends on their past attitude, their intentions as well as subjective norms.The fact that the individual has intentions implies that he has certain expectations.
The main ideas promoted by this theory also emphasize that;
- the individuals intention would affect his decision.
- the subject belief of others, example, family and friends would be a factor.
- the motivation for the action would also be a determining factor.
Prejudice is when you judge someone before you fully know the content of their character. Discrimination is when you act on your prejudice.
It is obviously not the last one the case is not as SEVERE, it isnt <span>-A homeowner wants to sue a builder for payment for a roof damaged by the builder's workers. that could just be issued in a regular Court case. So the two options are the remaining. The case would have to be really SEVERE for the Constitution to even review it. </span>
