Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
<em>Inaccurate</em>
Explanation:
<em>The information that was given to Alex Timbers who was a wood supplier that furniture manufacturing company requires teak wood, this information was </em><u><em>inaccurate</em></u><em>.</em>
Because we can see in the scenario which is mentioned in the question that the quality specialist of that furniture manufacturer company observes that the logs that was sent by Alex Timbers are very big, as the company itself ordered for teak wood, and we know that teak wood is very big. So, we can say that information provided by the company was inaccurate.
Answer:
The answer is D) None of these statement is relevant in the decision to further process the cream into butter.
Explanation:
option A) the amount paid to the farmers to purchase the unprocessed milk: this information is not relevant to further develop the cream and low fat milk to butter. It was already considered before this stage of production.
Option B) the cost of breaking down the unprocessed milk into cream and low-fat milk: this cost was already accounted for since the processing into cream and low fat milk is completed.
Option C) the portion of corporate fixed expenses that are currently being allocated to cream: This information is not going to help in the decision making for further processing.
This is a classic example of what is termed "Pork" or "Pork barrel politics". Pork is when a legislator tries to divert federal funds to projects in their districts or State. These funds provide jobs and income for his constituents who the will repay him with votes in the next election.
