First, it is necessary that this scientist decide on what point of the Cretaceous period he wants to study. Among several points he may want to study the evolution of microorganisms of that time, the life of a dinosaur species, or the evolution of dinosaurs, the flora that was established during this period, among others. This is the phase of the scientific method called Observation.
After that, he must enter the phase called "Elaboration of hypotheses" where he will raise questions about the point he decided to study. "How many flower species existed in that period?", "How many of these flowers can we observe today?" among others.
After that, he will enter the phase called "Experimentation", where he will establish a type of experiment and all the experimental factors and variables that will allow the hypotheses to be answered.
After the experiment he will collect the data that will be analyzed and that will give results that will answer the hypotheses previously established. This is the phase called "Analysis of the results".
At that moment, he will be able to reach the last phase of the scientific method, the phase called "conclusion", where he will show the conclusions that the experiment allowed to be established.
Answer:
Well, the primary distinction between these two types of organisms is that eukaryotic cells have a membrane-bound nucleus and prokaryotic cells do not. ... Prokaryotes, on the other hand, have no membrane-bound organelles. Another important difference is the DNA structure.
The answer is A because it’s produced by either moving or removing electrons from the neutral atom
Answer:
Retroviruses or reverse transcriptase
Explanation:
Retroviruses are viruses in which the genetic material consists of ribonucleic acid (RNA) instead of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Retroviruses produce an enzyme known as reverse transcriptase that uses RNA as a template to manufacture DNA, which can then be permanently integrated into the DNA of the infected host cells.
Hope this helps please mark brainliest :)
1. I believe the answer is William Herschel.
Francis Galton is often credited with the discovery that everyone's fingerprints are unique and that they could therefore be used for identification. However his works is extensively based on the work of Dr. Henry Faulds, who appears to have a better claim to the discovery, along with British magistrate William Herschel.
2. I believe that the ratio of height to width indicate size and consistency in hand writing analysis. The ratio of height, width and size of letters is among the characteristics of handwriting analysis that entails whether the letters are consistent in height, width and size.
3. I believe the statement that describes the line quality in handwriting analysis is whether the letters are shaky or flow continuously. Line quality is an indication of speed and fluency; the better the quality, the more skilled, or at least fast, the movement of the pen.
4. The statement that best indicates pen pressure in hand writing analysis is the down strokes and upstrokes are an even width.
Pen pressure is the pressure equal or unequal when applied to upward and down ward strokes. The pen pressure of a writer indicates his physical and emotional energy.
5. I think what is measured in the ridge count is spacing between ridge lines.
Ridge counting is the the counting of the ridges that touch or cross the line of count drawn between the delta and core of loop patterns. A white space must always intervene between the delta and the first ridge to be counted.
