The answer is the idea of mutations was understood by both but Lamarck was able to prove it.
The answer is : A compound light microscope has much greater magnification power than a dissecting microscope. Compound Microscopes have greater magnifications, but lower resolutions than the Dissecting microscopes. Compound light microscopes are usually used to view things that are too little to see with the naked eye.
Question is which is NOT a good technique.
Answer is "B" and here's why:
A) Clear questions -- good. People understanding the question will answer accurately.
C) Large sample size -- good. Answers will be more accurate with more people asked (like if you flip a coin 1,000 times its going to be closer to 50% heads than if you only flipped it twice)
D) Random sample -- good. Avoids your own bias in choosing who to ask.
B) Push poll -- bad. Pretends to be unbiased, the pollster's real objective is to get a person thinking in a way that is to their advantage. Some political candidates do this just before elections.
The stem
they get sun water and air separated it and put it back together
<em>The ATP molecule can store energy in the form of a high energy phosphate bond joining the terminal phosphate group to the rest of the molecule. In this form, energy can be stored at one location, then moved from one part of the cell to another, where it can be released to drive other biochemical reactions.</em>
