1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dlinn [17]
3 years ago
9

hello people if u are interesting in getting tutoring for any subject contact me i have the best auntie/tutor ever she nice and

she is a great teacher who can help with any thing if you need more information about this tutoring please feel free to comment below i will answer any questions :)
Business
1 answer:
Kitty [74]3 years ago
4 0
Me and my sister are in high school, and need tutoring in geometry and algebra 2, could she help?
You might be interested in
If you've been a victim of identity theft, what should you do after contacting the company that reported the suspicious charge a
bulgar [2K]
You should B. order a credit report.
hope this helps!
3 0
3 years ago
While the evidence suggests that over long periods of time that stocks will outperform bonds, individuals with a long-term inves
Scrat [10]

Answer:

Stocks and Bonds

Yes.  It is a rational behavior for individuals with a long-term investment horizon to choose to invest in bonds rather than investing in stocks despite the overwhelming "evidence that suggests that over long periods of time stocks still outperform bonds."

Rational behavior involves making rational choices that provide optimal levels of benefit or utility for the individual. People who make rational choices would rather choose bonds with lower risks and returns than stocks with higher risks and returns.

Explanation:

Every rational investor would prefer to reduce her risk exposure instead of increasing it.  Every investor is also aware that  investments with higher risks attract higher returns.  However, determining the certainty of the returns is difficult.

4 0
2 years ago
Read and compare the following two scenarios. Explain why the court should or should not pierce the corporate veil in each scena
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Answer:

Piercing the Corporate Veil:

1. Smith Services, Inc. and Laker Express:  With the given facts, Smith Services is still in operation by the alter ego, since Smith - the sole owner, has continued to provide trucking services.  Smith should be able to pay for the debts it owed Laker Express.  The question is: why was Smith Services, Inc. dissolved in the first place when the sole owner could continue privately to do the same business?  Is there element of fraud involved, or was it trying to avoid its obligations?  It seems that the dissolution was an effort to avoid liabilities and not because of impaired ability to operate the business because its own debtors did not pay for services on several contracts.  Another question is: during the dissolution or liquidation of Smith Services, Inc. were other creditors not settled and where was Laker Express then?

However, it appears that the dissolution was just to avoid liability, especially the $35,000 debt owed to Laker Express for fuel purchases.

Therefore, in this situation where it seems that the corporate form is ignored, commingling of assets exists, and that Smith Services, Inc. is an instrumentality for Tony Smith, I will advise that the corporate veil be lifted.  Tony Smith should be held liable for the business debts of Smith Services, Inc. because he has continued to use the assets of Smith Services, Inc. to run a sole proprietorship in the same line of business.  However, recourse must be had to the State laws on piercing the corporate veil.

2. Country Contractors, Inc. & Westside Storage of Indianapolis:

Since Country Contractors, Inc and the Westside Storage are based in Indiana, the decision to pierce the corporate veil should be based on the eight factors that are applicable for piercing the veil:  They include: undercapitalization;  absence of corporate records;  fraudulent representation by corporation shareholders or directors;  use of the corporation to promote fraud, injustice or illegal activities;  payment by the corporation of individual obligations;  commingling of assets and affairs;  failure to observe required corporate formalities; or  other shareholder acts or conduct ignoring, controlling, or manipulating the corporate form.

But, the facts in this case do not support that any of the factors had been breached.

So, I do not support that Songers are personally liable for Country's failure to complete its contract.

Explanation:

The corporate veil is an important instrument for protecting shareholders of corporations from being held liable for the liabilities of the corporation in their individual and personal capacities.  Corporate veil ensures that the entity is treated as a separate entity from its shareholders.  It is a protection offered by law to encourage private enterprise and ensure that the debts of corporate bodies are not tagged to the individual shareholders.  It is this veil that ensures the limited liability concept, whereby, the shareholders could only lose their capital contributions in case of business failure or dissolution.

Piercing the corporate veil is a court decision to lift the veil that separates the shareholders of corporation from their shareholders.  There are special factors that must be met for courts to pierce the corporate veil and they do it reluctantly.

5 0
3 years ago
A stock had returns of 12 percent, 16 percent, 10 percent, 19 percent, 15 percent, and -6 percent over the last six years. What
OleMash [197]

Answer:

10.68%

Explanation:

Data provided in the question:

Returns on stock : 12%, 16%, 10%, 19%, 15%, -6%

Now,

Geometric average return on the stock is calculated as:

Geometric average return = ({(1 + r_1)\times(1 + r_2).......\times(1 + r_n)})^\frac{1}{n}- 1

Thus,

For the given returns on stock

Geometric average return

=[ (1 + 0.12)\times(1 + 0.16)\times(1 + 0.10)\times(1 + 0.19)\times(1 + 0.15)\times(1 + (- 0.06)) ]^{\frac{1}{6}}-1

= [ 1.12\times1.16\times1.10\times1.19\times1.15\times0.94 ]^{\frac{1}{6}}-1

=  [1.8384056768]^{\frac{1}{6}}-1

= 1.1068 - 1

= 0.1068

or

= 0.1068 × 100%

= 10.68%

6 0
3 years ago
Public opinion suggests that overall, americans' commitment to the country and its core institutions is
ivanzaharov [21]
<span>Public opinion suggests that overall, Americans' commitment to the country and its core institutions is strong. Although the United States is composed of 50 states, it remains to be united in its cause. Until now, it is considered to be one of the most powerful countries in the world. This has been the case due to the Americans' strong sense of patriarchy.  </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Kameron Gibson’s bank statement showed a balance of $1,020.35. Kameron’s checkbook had a balance of $282.10. Check No. 104 for $
    5·1 answer
  • Three institutions that deal with human rights violations
    6·1 answer
  • A landlord will usually check your credit report before renting an apartment to you.
    15·2 answers
  • Garza Corporation has two production departments, Casting and Customizing. The company uses a job-order costing system and compu
    11·1 answer
  • It is Juan's 26th birthday and on his 26th birthday, he deposited $7,000 in a retirement account. Each year thereafter, he depos
    6·1 answer
  • How did huey long's plan to limit incomes violate the free enterprise system?
    7·1 answer
  • Why are organizational goals broken into sub goals that are assigned to departments
    9·1 answer
  • Please help!!!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • Harlon accounts for its equity investment portfolio at fair value through net income. Harlon sold its holdings of A Corporation
    9·1 answer
  • a country that has a lower opportunity cost associated with producing a given product compared to another country would have a(n
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!