Decreases. It is vice Versa. If one increases another does too and so vice versa too.
Answer:
competitive exclusion.
Explanation:
When species from the same biological community explore very similar ecological niches, competition among them for less available resources in the environment is instituted. It is common, for example, that plant species whose roots use the same portion of the soil compete for water, minerals and other resources.
Knowing this, Russian biologist Georgyi Frantsevich Gause formulated the Gause principle, or competitive exclusion principle, the theory that ecological niches are unique to each species, and for two or more of them to coexist in the same habitat, it is necessary that their niches have different and sufficient characteristics.
Gause proposed this theory based on several observations that led him to conclude that if two or more species explore exactly the same ecological niche, the competition established between them is so sharp that coexistence becomes impossible. This can cause a loss in species diversity, and that is exactly what Robert Paine observed in his studies.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can answer the following.
Alfred suffers from an extreme and irrational fear of spiders. His fear is exaggerated and disproportionate to the actual danger he might be in if he did encounter a spider. Alfred's fear of spiders is so intense that he would go to almost any length to avoid coming into contact with them. Alfred is most likely to be diagnosed with specific phobia.
When an individual presents a case of specific phobia, this means that it has an exaggerated fear for an insect, animal, situation, or object. The interesting part is that this fear is overwhelming although the object of the fear does not really represent a danger to the individual. The individual's fear is extreme to the degree that this person can behave in strange, panic, or violent ways.
Answer: increase in MOney Supply
Explanation:
Answer:
Implicit prejudice; explicit prejudice.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, both of this cases of prejudice involves negative attitudes against a certain individual, person, group, etc. In the first case, the implicit, the attitude is not openly talked, verbalized; it's unspoken. But, in the second case, the explicit prejudice involves the awareness of hatred or negative attitude of the individual. So, overall, in the first case the person is not completely aware of the thoughts, attitude or feelings, but on the second case it is completely.
