Answer:
One party of Franks, namely, Peter, the Hermit Duke Godfrey, Baldwin, his brother, ... Robert the Norman, Hugh the Great, Everard of Puiset, Achard of Montmerle, ... The wise man, Bohemund, also said that if the Count should do the Emperor any ... We did not dare to go outside; we could find absolutely nothing to eat within
Explanation:
Raymond of Toulouse, Robert of Normandy, Robert of Flanders, ... It makes much more sense to suppose, in so far as one can ... For Bohemond, who was to become Prince of Antioch, his social status was elevated substantially. ... The next day Hugh again went out to talk with Godfrey,
I took this test the answer is B. introspection
No, it's like a massive prison. If you attempt to leave, you will be publicly executed.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Pam is not violating the law of demand. The law of demand suggests that the supply of a product varies with demand. When demand increases, price increases, when demand decreases, price decreases. Notice that Pam has decreased hamburger consumption, meaning it has contributed to the decrease in demand. If the demand for hamburgers has decreased, it is only natural that the price of hamburgers will decrease. It should be noted that even if the hamburger price had risen and Pam no longer consumed hamburgers, the law of demand would still not be violated. This is because the law of demand takes into account aggregate demand (from all consumers) rather than individual demand. So Pam could have stopped eating hamburger as a matter of preference for another item.
