When Elizabeth I took over the throne of England, she inherited a virtually bankrupt state. So she introduced frugal policies to restore fiscal responsibilities. She cleared the regime of debt by 1574, and 10 years on the Crown enjoyed a surplus of £300,000.
Answer:
Democratic Party.
Explanation:
Typically, the Democratic Party holds more seats as they have more registered voters. Seats are divided based on the population amount each state has, and they are furthered divided by the population of each district. However, the current climate is that many voters are disinterested with the Democractic Party because of their overreaching policies, so if many voters flip their party, then the 2022 elections may go in favor of the Republican Party.
~
Learn more about the Political Party of today, here:
brainly.com/question/23492610?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Poverty and wealth are often found side by side. They are two dimensions in our world that are interrelated because they affect each other and influence both the willingness and capacity of states to ensure a stable global system. Traditional approaches to IR are premised on the notion of state sovereignty. But, sovereignty as an absolute concept that reinforces separation between states has been tempered through the many processes of globalisation, including economic agreements and the establishment of international organisations, as well as with the emergence of human rights thinking as captured through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. With respect to the emergence of human rights thinking, the premise goes that in the context of a common set of universal rights based on the individual, the sovereignty of the state can be challenged if a government does not respect or maintain these rights. Here, sovereignty means that a state does not only maintain rights, it also meets its responsibilities. Poor people are cheated out of their savings and the rich flaunt their money like it's honest and hard worked generated money.
The answer to this problem is "EXCLUSIVE". Hence when <span>Betty Roberts became an embarrassment to her company during the time when she joked about the ruling monarchy in England in front or during the presence of a group of visiting English business people. She should have known that political ridicule by a foreigner is rarely accepted. Then Ms. Roberts has violated what is known as a cultural EXCLUSIVE.</span>
