Answer:
B. prices would do a better job of coordinating the activities of buyers and sellers than markets could.
Explanation:
In 1776, the Scottish economist and philosopher also known as the father of economics, suggested that price was better left to produce better market results than the intervention of guilds.
He was of the opinion that price control and regulations by guilds were disruptions to market play and would not be as efficient as allowing price be determined by the market(buyers and sellers). Adam was a pioneer of the free market economic theory.
The given statement is true as the evolutionary theorists accepted that the growth of the societies was based on the similar or different stages of social development.
<h3>What is social development?</h3>
Social development refers to the betterment of the standard of living of the people residing in the society.
In the year the 1800s, there was no theory that fully describes the aspects relating to changes in societies. As a result, the theorists trusted that societal growth entirely depends on similar or distinct stages of social development.
Therefore, the theories of the 1800s explained the distinct or same stages of social development which would be the result of the growth of societies.
Learn more about the social development in the related link:
brainly.com/question/1651136
#SPJ4
Answer:
I personally think that Alexander the Great was better.
Explanation:
Although he didn't care much about the citizens he conquered many city states in a shorter amount of time then other kings could.