Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
Below are the choices:
Proposed a 'middle ground' option to break deadlocks.
Worked to avoid options that others might disagree with.
Used your influence to make sure your own ideas were accepted.
Tried to find one solution which satisfies everyone's expectations.
<span>Changed your own position to accommodate the interests of others.
The answer: </span><span>Tried to find one solution which satisfies everyone's expectations.</span>
Answer:
Structural Functionalism
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the study is an example of Structural Functionalism. In the context of sociology, this term refers to a theory made in order to explain why society functions in the way that it does, by emphasizing relationships between social institutions and society. Therefore a study attempting to find out why society likes a certain story as opposed to another one would be an example of this theory.
Answer:
Grand Canal was expanded and improved, overland trade routes, some of the greatest writers, porcelain, wood block printing, gunpowder, improved magnetic compass, and paper money are all advancements made during which dynasty.
Google ; )
Answer:
The 14th Amendments Equal Protection Clause
Explanation: This clause requires that all people residing in the US should be treated the same. The 14th's Equal Protection Clause forces states to govern impartially and not draw distinctions between individuals solely on differences that are irrelevant to a legitimate governmental objectives. Equal Protection Clause makes no distinction between citizens and non-citizens.
Recognition by components (RBC) and feature integration theory (FIT) do a good job of explaining how perception works but fail in one important area. accounting for knowledge and experience. Option A
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
Recognition by components (RBC)?</h3>
Generally, Irving Biederman first suggested the recognition-by-components hypothesis, sometimes known as the RBC theory, in 1987 in an effort to provide an explanation for object recognition.
In conclusion, Both the recognition by components theory (RBC) and the feature integration theory (FIT) do a decent job of describing how perception works, but both of them fall short in one crucial area. taking into consideration one's acquired skills and experience Alternative A
Read more about Recognition by components (RBC)
brainly.com/question/5439846
#SPJ1
complete question
Recognition by components (RBC) and feature integration theory (FIT) do a good job of explaining how perception works, but fail in one important area. What is that area?
A. accounting for knowledge and experience
B. how specific features are used to combine into the objects that we perceive
C. the neurological pathway from the eye to the visual cortex
D. the neurology behind the dorsal and ventral streams
