Answer:
Two different "states of mind" that affect behavior differently.
Explanation:
The <em>learned helplessness </em>affects our behavior that when we find ourselves in a sudden unexpected situation, we will react surprised, scared, or behave hopelessly. Without a solution how to deal with that situation. While this is the case in humans, animals in this situation will know exactly how to behave, because of their innate animal instinct.
On the other hand, <em>learned optimism</em> is a total opposite from learned helplessness. It helps us over time to respond positively to any situation that we find ourselves in. Made of joy,strong mental will. Learned optimism shows us how to turn negativity into positivism.
Answer:
Drinking alcohol has be proven to harm your liver.
Explanation:
One way the U.S. government is able to balance the core political value of free enterprise and that of justice and fairness is <u>Minimum Wage Laws. </u>
<h3>Meaning of the above mentioned core values</h3>
- Fairness and Justice - people should be treated in a way that is not discriminatory and allows for them to live a good enough life.
- Free enterprise - people are free to establish businesses with the aim of making profit.
Free enterprise means that in the course of making profits, business owners can pay poor wages which wouldn't be fair.
This is where minimum wage laws then come in to balance this out and ensure that people get fair wages while still allowing a free market.
Find out more on free enterprise at brainly.com/question/13628349.
In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
