Answer:
c.adults were poor back then,so they had to force their children to work
a)
The main claim of the passage is that, by implementing Prohibition, the United States took a step that was much more extreme and permanent than any of those that had been taken in other industrialized nations in connection with alcohol. The evidence that supports this argument is the fact that such legislation was included in the Constitution and in federal law.
b)
A piece of evidence that would help support the argument in the excerpt would be a list of measures that other countries took in respect to the topic of alcohol consumption. This would allow us to compare different measures between countries more easily.
c)
One way in which the process discussed in the passage compares with earlier reform movements is in the relentlessness and tirelessness of the people who encouraged reform. Both reform movements attempted to achieve great goals, and to influence federal legislation permanently.
The revolutions of 1830 and especially 1858 resulted in complete and utter failure. The fact that it excluded too many people from the brave new world was the major reason for its failure. The liberals took advantage of an unusual opportunity to realise their dreams of national liberation, but they did so only for their personal benefit.
I believe a give and take agreement is either a treaty or contract, i'll look it up.
Answer: B. were not completely unified
