The present location/position is central Uttar Pradesh state, northern India... sorry for the mistake of not seeing the whole picture
A. prove the legitimacy of dynastic rule is your answer
Mandate of Heaven was the saying that there should only be one ruler, which the gods approve of. This would rule out B) and D). Because the ruler is approved by the gods, it means that all should obey the appointed king.
hope this helps
The answer is: Job training and career counseling for people with disabilities.
Q1: defense spending was decreased as tensions between the united states and the soviet union lessened
Q2: A global surge of organic and sustainable agriculture
Q3: religion
Q4: provide a committee to focus on basic human rights and freedoms
Q5: This was the acronym for political talks between the united states and the ussr regarding nuclear weapons
Q6: Enhance social programs to better the lives of Chinese citizens
Q7: Poland east Germany and the soviet Union
Q8: a lack of history and experience with self-government
Q9: the formation of NATO
Q10: the nuclear disaster at the Chernobyl destroyed the confidence of the people
Q11: strategic limitation of nuclear arms
The Treaty of Versailles Yes, I think that the Treaty of Versailles was very fair to Germany. I think this because Germany deserved something bad in return for even starting the war. It was not fair to Germany how they did not really have a say on what went on in with the Treaty of Versailles. Germany should have known this was going to happen to them. They caused many men to become hurt, and even be killed by their own stupidity. Using the Schliffen Plan might of been good on their part,but in reality that was not a very good move for them. Continuing on and looking at Europe. Europe was destroyed and that should all be put on Germany's shoulders for that because Europe did not deserve anything of what happened to them. I would also have to say that I mostly agree with what Woodrow Wilson had to say. He said that Germany should pay for the things they have done and that is exactly it! I agree with not being able to have an air force in the air which is fair to some point. Flying over others to see where, and what they are doing I think is wrong. That is why I agree with the terms of not being able to have an air force in the air because if you did then you would easily be able to take out the enemy, and who would not do that? Anybody would most likely because it is most likely easier to kill more people with a plane then it is to shoot somebody. I surely did not agree with the fact that some of the land that was already claimed was taken away. From then on with the economy not being that great some countries did not have enough land where as some were on the edge of having nothing.
