Depends on what the picture is. I would guess the most logical one is D. Think about the Amazon Rain forest.
Answer&Explanation:
This principle refers to those action which are legally permitted but are also likely to result to severe impact which wasn't initially intended like the death of a person as a side effect of the good action that was actual intended.
For example a doctor may give a patient some pills to relieve stress symptoms eventhough the doctor knows that this may have side effect such as actual shortening their life.
The doctor's intention are not to kill the patient but the death would be a side effect of the good results which are to reduce the patient's pain.
Another example is in the warfare where soldiers may go on a mission that requires that what ever action they take few civilian may get hurt in the process but the intention isn't to kill those civilian but it is a side effects of the good operation of eliminating the legitimate target which may be a threat to a country.
The systematic study of human population is called, demography.
The Latin American revolutionaries
John Locke, the English rationalist who accepted that all information originates as a matter of fact and a conviction that infers influence the Latin American revolutionaries that experience, as opposed to birth, makes people what their identity is, consequently calling into questions the reason for the standing arrangement of Europe.
Locke contended that each individual has natural rights which can't be removed. He gave the thought regarding the privilege of life, opportunity, and property and it was the characteristic right we have from birth.
The Latin's understood that they are constrained by the legislature and should utilize balanced governance.
