Go to your social studies book read the then throughly then ask your parents for some help if you still don’t understand
Answer:
Hello, I’m sorry I can’t identify this person with that picture, can you take the picture again but clearer? Sorry.
Explanation:
<span>The scenario in which Alex sees a girl in a red shirt steal a candy bar and </span>during questioning, the police ask what candy the girl in the blue shirt stole and then <span> months later, when alex testifies in court, he describes the girl as having worn a blue shirt is an example </span><span>suggestibility. Correct answer: B
</span> Alex accepted the police suggestion (<span>during questioning, the police ask what candy the girl in the blue shirt stole ).</span>
Oral evidence to ""fill in the gaps"" of a contract with incomplete terms can be introduced at a trial. The statement is true .
At a trial, oral testimony can be used to "fill in the gaps" of a contract with omitted clauses. Any agreement that is not in writing is null and void according to the Statute of Frauds. Ordinarily, an oral agreement that is supposed to be in paper is void.
Oral evidence can be shown by a witness who was present when they occurred or by a recording of the agreement at the time it occurred. This could be the proof that a person offers to support their claim. Oral agreements are dangerous and unsafe since one never knows when someone will retract their own claims.
To learn more about oral evidence here
brainly.com/question/3520914
#SPJ4
A bear market
Hope this helps :)
